Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Trustless Cent & 2 smaller cuds
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="bhp3rd, post: 821469, member: 16510"]That Lincoln is a nice "cud" very nice the others are very minor.</p><p>To help answer many error coins had "old time" names before the modern minting procedures were really studied and fully understood. </p><p>"Godless" "atheist" "trustless" did often descibe the error very well for the times.</p><p>We now know that your Lincoln is a "Cud" why it's a cud and how it happens. There is no data on how long they were left in service after they break and it's not so much how long they were left in service <b>but how large the bin was that contained that "lot of the coins" including the die break coins. </b> The numbers in modern minted coins that could be struck after or while a die is breaking could be as high as 750 per minute with a quad press. It's really a foremans job to spot the break and make a descision on replacing the die and how many are in that particular bin, or lot as to whether they end up letting these go or destoying the whole bunch. It boils down to a lot of different production choices as to whether we "can get by", or better not try type of thing you know.</p><p>A Lincoln cud like yours probably would have been caught after a couple thousand strikes and a coin (die break) like that would have been replaced at once. They would probably scoop the top part of the pile and see how many in a sample as to whether or not they would destroy the lot.</p><p>It goes like that something like that but one more thing. Dies are extremley precious, they need to make thousands for a years run on each denomination. On the one hand they want to let them remain in service just as long as possible but on the other hand they do not want to get yelled at by the boss. Given this they do stretch them but we don't have die breaks like yours anymore. A 2009 Lincoln Cent in gem BU with that large a die break would be a $1000 coin in todays market. We just do not see them like that anymore so they probably destroy larger lots more often or the die steel and production standards are just so much better now than when your coin was struck, they just do not break like this any longer. Hope this helps you.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="bhp3rd, post: 821469, member: 16510"]That Lincoln is a nice "cud" very nice the others are very minor. To help answer many error coins had "old time" names before the modern minting procedures were really studied and fully understood. "Godless" "atheist" "trustless" did often descibe the error very well for the times. We now know that your Lincoln is a "Cud" why it's a cud and how it happens. There is no data on how long they were left in service after they break and it's not so much how long they were left in service [B]but how large the bin was that contained that "lot of the coins" including the die break coins. [/B] The numbers in modern minted coins that could be struck after or while a die is breaking could be as high as 750 per minute with a quad press. It's really a foremans job to spot the break and make a descision on replacing the die and how many are in that particular bin, or lot as to whether they end up letting these go or destoying the whole bunch. It boils down to a lot of different production choices as to whether we "can get by", or better not try type of thing you know. A Lincoln cud like yours probably would have been caught after a couple thousand strikes and a coin (die break) like that would have been replaced at once. They would probably scoop the top part of the pile and see how many in a sample as to whether or not they would destroy the lot. It goes like that something like that but one more thing. Dies are extremley precious, they need to make thousands for a years run on each denomination. On the one hand they want to let them remain in service just as long as possible but on the other hand they do not want to get yelled at by the boss. Given this they do stretch them but we don't have die breaks like yours anymore. A 2009 Lincoln Cent in gem BU with that large a die break would be a $1000 coin in todays market. We just do not see them like that anymore so they probably destroy larger lots more often or the die steel and production standards are just so much better now than when your coin was struck, they just do not break like this any longer. Hope this helps you.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Trustless Cent & 2 smaller cuds
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...