Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Ordinary Fool, post: 2766013, member: 85318"]Well stop it, it's easy enough to bookmark the handful of sites that have attributations for modern coinage and quickly take a peek. Not all Doubled Dies look like a 1955 or 1969 eye crossers, and you very well know that too. The left side of the Memorial is most likely MD, but....one of many on the list mined from this site after being automatically gang-dismissed would be: that 1979 nickel, with the morbidly obese outer devices that yall just as automatically shot down, which was most likely in fact, an unattributed variety and others have definitely since been found. Class II DDO I believe. Stash, the E, D and S on this one....... looks very early compared to 001. Your thoughts? I hear you on matching up the pix to those found with the attributations. However, take those huge high resolution pix at CW, I can slice and rotate them any way I need too and most leave virtually nothing to question. Simple enough on any Windows machine with the native photoviewer. Many there are quite adequate for serious die studies and I am certain 30 years ago, serious numismatists never imagined imaging coins would be as easy as it is today. It's only going to get better from now with automatic macro image stacking close to being on very capable cellphones.[/QUOTE]