Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 972726, member: 22331&quot;]<b>A Common Viewing Problem</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Arial Black">I believe you are probably in the majority, as I&#039;ve made numerous attempts to correct the viewing problem. I eventually realized that because of the combination of seemingly incompatible font/background colors and font size, I found it virtually impossible to read the majority of information posted. I knew that if I were to read/interact with the new software, I would need to compromise. </font></p><p><font face="Arial Black"><br /></font></p><p><font face="Arial Black">I, by necessity, type in the dark using the Qwerty system, and because of the aforementioned characteristics, could not see an error if my arthritic large fingers stuck the wrong key. I needed to find a font which spread/darkened the typed characters, thus my selection of Arial Black font. I also found that if the display characteristics were changed to a lesser number of pixels displayed, and Large Font, reading posts is acceptable. However, I can&#039;t view any post with images, because of the need to constantly scroll left/right/up/down to view portions of the image.</font></p><p><font face="Arial Black"><br /></font></p><p><font face="Arial Black"></font><font face="Arial Black"> I also would love to view an entire image without &quot;scrolling&quot;, as I remember it to be in the past. I found the past &quot; full view&quot; capability to be an awesome means for constructive explanation, and was &quot;awed&quot; at some of the posts which taught this &quot;old man&quot; many things that couldn&#039;t be viewed normally. This educational feature alone generated my desire to return, and &quot;sponsor&quot;. I realize that because of other program defaults in the program &quot;upgrade&quot;, this may not be a possibility, but just an item to top a &quot;wish list&quot;.</font></p><p><font face="Arial Black"><br /></font></p><p><font face="Arial Black"> I suspect that the irritating idiosyncrasies of the software update are inherent by design. and can&#039;t be corrected without code change. I believe that we can individually temporarily compensate to meet our requirements. It appears that the past acceptable program characteristics utilized by the average viewer, is probably &quot;history&quot;.</font></p><p><font face="Arial Black"><br /></font></p><p><font face="Arial Black">I believe that this forum is enlightening/informative, and hope that we individually can find methods to compensate, and accept seeming deficiencies, which hopefully will be corrected in the future. I personally have found some new program features to be more desirable than past, but generally prefer the past design, and trust that others will join me in having some patience, while hopefully stated &quot;deficiencies&quot; are improved/corrected. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></font></p><p><font face="Arial Black"><br /></font></p><p><font face="Arial Black"><br /></font></p><p><font face="Arial Black"></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in