Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
TRIVIA: Differences Between the 1968 and 1969 Lincoln Head Cent Obverses
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Clinker, post: 1277463, member: 6229"]<font face="arial"><font size="3">As you know, over the life of a series of coins, changes are made to improve the looks of coins, to improve useage, to appease critics and to save money in costs of coin production. This article deals with another often occurance:</font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"> </font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3">Worn or overused <i>Master dies</i>. Since the first time the mint produced over a billion coins (1944 Lincoln Head Cents) things, like design and letter spreading, became evident on the coins minted.</font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"> </font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3">The original chosen coin design's image begins its journey to the final coin product with a plaster sculpture about 8 to 12 inches in diameter, from which a <i>Master Hub</i> is created using a special process that reduces the image to actual coin size. This <i>Master Hub</i>, which bears a relief image of the coin design, is then copied into a select number of <i>Master Dies</i>, (which bear the negative, or incuse image of the coin.</font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3">The <i>Master Dies</i> are then copied, using a special extremely high-pressure "squeezing" process which employs tremendous hydraulic force, to create the <i>Working Hubs</i> (commonly simply called <i>hubs</i>.) Then, from <i>Hubs</i>, the mint creates the <i>Working Dies</i> . It is from these <i>dies</i> that our coins are actually struck.</font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3">The coin image on the hub is always a positive, or relief image, and the image on the die is always a negative, or incuse image. In this way, when our coins are struck, we get the raised detail we expect on our circulating coinage.</font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3">The coin hub itself looks just like a coin die, with the exception of the relief image. It is comprised of a steel shaft with the image of the coin impressed into one end of it.</font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3">The 1968 Cent's obverse was victim to the letter and image spreading problem. When you view the photo of the 1968 Cent, notice how the letter spreading problem pushed the letters to the very rim of the coins. The image of Lincoln looks worn and flattened (Coinpage.com photo):</font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"> </font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><a href="http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-1040.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-1040.html" rel="nofollow"><u><font size="4"><span style="color: #0000ff"><font size="4"><span style="color: #0000ff">http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-1040.html</span></font></span></font></u></a></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4"> </font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4">In 1969 the Mint changed the obverse <i>Master dies</i> to correct this problem. Not only did they change the obverse <i>Master dies</i>, but they incorporated the design of the obverse <i>Master die</i> to that of Victor David Brenner's original obverse design. Take a close look at the lettering on this 1969 Lincoln Head Cent. The letters are crisper and do not touch the rim. The image is clearer (coinpage.com photo).</font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4"> </font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4"></font><a href="http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-2069.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-2069.html" rel="nofollow"><u><font size="4"><span style="color: #0000ff"><font size="4"><span style="color: #0000ff">http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-2069.html</span></font></span></font></u></a></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4"> </font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4">Since you've read this article all the way through you're entitled to compare the obverse design of the 1969 Lincoln Head Cent to that of Victor David Brenner's original 1909 design. Here's the photo of a 1909-S V.D.B. Lincoln Head Cent courtesy of coinpage.com:</font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4"> </font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4"></font><a href="http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-8009.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-8009.html" rel="nofollow"><u><font size="4"><span style="color: #0000ff"><font size="4"><span style="color: #0000ff">http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-8009.html</span></font></span></font></u></a><font size="4"> </font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4"> </font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4">Who would've thought. Did you know?</font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4"> </font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4">Clinker</font></font></font></p><p><font face="arial"><font size="3"><font size="4"></font></font></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Clinker, post: 1277463, member: 6229"][FONT=arial][SIZE=3]As you know, over the life of a series of coins, changes are made to improve the looks of coins, to improve useage, to appease critics and to save money in costs of coin production. This article deals with another often occurance: Worn or overused [I]Master dies[/I]. Since the first time the mint produced over a billion coins (1944 Lincoln Head Cents) things, like design and letter spreading, became evident on the coins minted. The original chosen coin design's image begins its journey to the final coin product with a plaster sculpture about 8 to 12 inches in diameter, from which a [I]Master Hub[/I] is created using a special process that reduces the image to actual coin size. This [I]Master Hub[/I], which bears a relief image of the coin design, is then copied into a select number of [I]Master Dies[/I], (which bear the negative, or incuse image of the coin. The [I]Master Dies[/I] are then copied, using a special extremely high-pressure "squeezing" process which employs tremendous hydraulic force, to create the [I]Working Hubs[/I] (commonly simply called [I]hubs[/I].) Then, from [I]Hubs[/I], the mint creates the [I]Working Dies[/I] . It is from these [I]dies[/I] that our coins are actually struck. The coin image on the hub is always a positive, or relief image, and the image on the die is always a negative, or incuse image. In this way, when our coins are struck, we get the raised detail we expect on our circulating coinage. The coin hub itself looks just like a coin die, with the exception of the relief image. It is comprised of a steel shaft with the image of the coin impressed into one end of it. The 1968 Cent's obverse was victim to the letter and image spreading problem. When you view the photo of the 1968 Cent, notice how the letter spreading problem pushed the letters to the very rim of the coins. The image of Lincoln looks worn and flattened (Coinpage.com photo): [URL="http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-1040.html"][U][SIZE=4][COLOR=#0000ff][SIZE=4][COLOR=#0000ff]http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-1040.html[/COLOR][/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/URL] [SIZE=4] In 1969 the Mint changed the obverse [I]Master dies[/I] to correct this problem. Not only did they change the obverse [I]Master dies[/I], but they incorporated the design of the obverse [I]Master die[/I] to that of Victor David Brenner's original obverse design. Take a close look at the lettering on this 1969 Lincoln Head Cent. The letters are crisper and do not touch the rim. The image is clearer (coinpage.com photo). [/SIZE][URL="http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-2069.html"][U][SIZE=4][COLOR=#0000ff][SIZE=4][COLOR=#0000ff]http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-2069.html[/COLOR][/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/URL] [SIZE=4] Since you've read this article all the way through you're entitled to compare the obverse design of the 1969 Lincoln Head Cent to that of Victor David Brenner's original 1909 design. Here's the photo of a 1909-S V.D.B. Lincoln Head Cent courtesy of coinpage.com: [/SIZE][URL="http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-8009.html"][U][SIZE=4][COLOR=#0000ff][SIZE=4][COLOR=#0000ff]http://www.coinpage.com/coin-image-8009.html[/COLOR][/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE][/U][/URL][SIZE=4] Who would've thought. Did you know? Clinker [/SIZE][/SIZE][/FONT][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
TRIVIA: Differences Between the 1968 and 1969 Lincoln Head Cent Obverses
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...