Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Roman Collector, post: 2730963, member: 75937&quot;]I like this one despite its porous surface for a couple of reasons. It&#039;s from the Antioch mint, whereas Rome was still the principle mint during Trebonius Gallus&#039; hapless reign, it&#039;s an architectural type, and it has a misspelling on the reverse inscription (SAECVLLVM instead of SAECVLVM).</p><p><br /></p><p>Post your Trebonianuses, architectural types, spelling variants, or whatnot!</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]620948[/ATTACH]</p><p>Trebonianus Gallus, AD 251-253</p><p>Roman AR Antoninianus, 4.70 g</p><p>Antioch, AD 251-252</p><p>Obv: IMP C C VIB TREB GALLVS P F AVG, radiate bust right, IIV below bust</p><p>Rev: SAECVLLVM NOVVM, Hexastyle temple containing seated statue of Rome, IIV in exergue</p><p>Refs: RIC 91; Cohen 111; RCV 9648[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in