Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Treasure-Trove, its Ancient and Modern Laws
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Gavin Richardson, post: 2971633, member: 83956"]An interesting bit of background info to a contemporary issue, Ed.</p><p><br /></p><p>And of course, there’s the Biblical parable of the hidden treasure in a field from Matthew 13:44: “The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field. When a man found it, he hid it again, and then in his joy went and sold all he had and bought that field.”</p><p><br /></p><p>Jesus seems to speak approvingly of the man’s actions, though it’s a hard parable to parse. Was the man (clearly not the property owner) legally entitled to the find under Jewish (or Roman provincial?) law, but had to buy the land in order to extract the treasure easily–which seems to be the Wiki interpretation?</p><p><br /></p><p>Or did the treasure fully belong to the property owner, so the worker bought the land so that he could legally claim the treasure too?</p><p><br /></p><p>The difficulty for me here is that the worker appears to be sneaky or unethical, keeping the find from the property owner, and yet Jesus seems to affirm his action. Perhaps the point of the parable is to seek the Kingdom by any means necessary.</p><p><br /></p><p>But nowhere in the parable is it implied that the find should go to the state or ruling authority.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Gavin Richardson, post: 2971633, member: 83956"]An interesting bit of background info to a contemporary issue, Ed. And of course, there’s the Biblical parable of the hidden treasure in a field from Matthew 13:44: “The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field. When a man found it, he hid it again, and then in his joy went and sold all he had and bought that field.” Jesus seems to speak approvingly of the man’s actions, though it’s a hard parable to parse. Was the man (clearly not the property owner) legally entitled to the find under Jewish (or Roman provincial?) law, but had to buy the land in order to extract the treasure easily–which seems to be the Wiki interpretation? Or did the treasure fully belong to the property owner, so the worker bought the land so that he could legally claim the treasure too? The difficulty for me here is that the worker appears to be sneaky or unethical, keeping the find from the property owner, and yet Jesus seems to affirm his action. Perhaps the point of the parable is to seek the Kingdom by any means necessary. But nowhere in the parable is it implied that the find should go to the state or ruling authority.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Treasure-Trove, its Ancient and Modern Laws
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...