Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Roman Collector, post: 2594498, member: 75937&quot;]Once something has been published by experts, it&#039;s difficult to change people&#039;s opinions. The BMC is apparently the earliest published listing of this coin. It attributes it to Claudius/Agrippina II. Sear (and I think Lindgren, but I don&#039;t have Lindgren I to verify) follow suit. </p><p><br /></p><p>BMC, vol 20, p. 296, no. 1:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]565251[/ATTACH]&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s pl. XXXVII, but the copy on Google books is of very low quality at reproducing the plate:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]565252[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>And here&#039;s the listing in Sear:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]565254[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Once it has been attributed in the past, it&#039;s &quot;set in stone&quot; and people are reluctant to argue with the traditional attributions.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in