Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
TPGs, Pedigrees, and Coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="The_Cave_Troll, post: 362631, member: 1674"]I think you may be confused. That coin was never AU, it has always been a proof. It was catalogged decated ago as an impaired proof based on the chatter/reed marks on the coinand was assigned a net grade in the 50's. Since then it has sold at auction twice with no grade assigned because the cataloggers each time knew what it had been called before and that the actual grade was irrelevant to its value. It had never been seen by a grading company prior to NGC certifying it and they called it a 62. That grade more accurately describes how bust dollars are graded right now than a PR58 would have, though the price realized wouldn't likely have changed because this coin is ranked among the Class 1 1804's and whether it is a 50 or 58, or 62 it's rank remains the same.</p><p><br /></p><p>this is one of the rare cases where the grader(s) were acutely aware of who owned the coin, who submitted the coin, and the irrelevance of what grade they actually assigned to it as long as they didn't disrupt the coins position in the condition census.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="The_Cave_Troll, post: 362631, member: 1674"]I think you may be confused. That coin was never AU, it has always been a proof. It was catalogged decated ago as an impaired proof based on the chatter/reed marks on the coinand was assigned a net grade in the 50's. Since then it has sold at auction twice with no grade assigned because the cataloggers each time knew what it had been called before and that the actual grade was irrelevant to its value. It had never been seen by a grading company prior to NGC certifying it and they called it a 62. That grade more accurately describes how bust dollars are graded right now than a PR58 would have, though the price realized wouldn't likely have changed because this coin is ranked among the Class 1 1804's and whether it is a 50 or 58, or 62 it's rank remains the same. this is one of the rare cases where the grader(s) were acutely aware of who owned the coin, who submitted the coin, and the irrelevance of what grade they actually assigned to it as long as they didn't disrupt the coins position in the condition census.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
TPGs, Pedigrees, and Coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...