Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GoldFinger1969, post: 2085872, member: 73489&quot;]Agreed, I thought even the Big Two had a few years where they were a bit slack.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Excellent point, I agree.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Overgraded ???&nbsp; I would say &#039;fine for the grade&#039; but just because the undergradeds &#039;graduated&#039; when resubmitted I don&#039;t think the bulk of the remainder are necessarily overgraded.</p><p><br /></p><p>Numerically, yes, since the population lost the highest-quality I guess you can say if it was on average correctly graded then I guess you could imply in the aggregate they are now undergraded.</p><p><br /></p><p>But I would also think that any MS-65 Saint or Morgan in an OGH is more likely to be SOLID for the grade than a similarly-graded coin in later years.&nbsp; Even though, again, the population for the Saints/Morgans in the OGH lost its creme de la creme.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in