Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
TPG Conservation of Nickel Coinage
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8359440, member: 24314"]BadThad, posted: <span style="color: #00b300">"You're overthinking it, </span><b><i><span style="color: #ff0000">it's simple</span></i></b><span style="color: #00b300"> and also applies to</span> <span style="color: #b30000">to</span><span style="color: #5900b3">ni</span><span style="color: #b300b3">ng</span>."</p><p><br /></p><p><i>I'm not overthinking anything.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> I just added a bunch of nonsense <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> to make a point. <b>ALL CONSERVATION </b>is some form of cleaning, repairing. replacing, surface alteration, etc. Thus we are in 100% agreement -<b> <span style="color: #ff0000">it's simple.</span></b> However, your example of toning is <b>NOT</b> THE SAME AT ALL. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></i></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #00b300">"A coin is either considered market acceptable or not - regardless what you call about the journey there. </span></p><p><span style="color: #00b300"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><i>"Market acceptability" is a TPGS <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie81" alt=":shifty:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> crutch to cover our butts because oxidation is either 100% natural (no matter how long it took) or not natural. Much of the time it is hard to know which it actually is. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie57" alt=":jawdrop:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> The same cannot be said for conservation because in many cases of proper conservation the coin looks 100% natural as if it were never touched. So it is either CLEANED or NOT. Just because some cleaned coins are "market <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie81" alt=":shifty:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> acceptable" does not indicate they are not cleaned BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE THAT THEY HAVE BEEN CLEANED IS VISIBLE! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie85" alt=":smuggrin:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></i></span></p><p><span style="color: #00b300"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #00b300">That is why I much prefer to use the terms "cleaned" for not market acceptable and "conserved" for a market acceptable coin. It's a simple matter of colloquial nomenclature for convenience in discussion</span>.</p><p><br /></p><p><i>You are free to use any words you wish. Just understand that the conserved coin has been altered - most often by a simple, undetectable cleaning.</i> </p><p><br /></p><p><i><b><span style="color: #ff0000">It's simple.</span></b></i></p><p><i><b><span style="color: #ff0000"><br /></span></b></i></p><p><i><span style="color: #000000">As for the 1955-S 1c you asked me about... There is no way to determine the answer as you'll get opinions one way or the other by every famous, knowledgeable, professional numismatist, copper collector/dealer, etc. </span></i></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><i>But I will not duck an honest question. </i></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><i><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">I do not like the two-toned coin and would not keep it. It looks chemically treated; however, (thanks for tipping it in the light) if it came into the grading room </span></i><span style="color: #00b300">I should give it</span> <span style="color: #00b300">a</span><b><span style="color: #00b300"> high, straight, </span><span style="color: #ff8000">R</span><span style="color: #b35900">B</span><span style="color: #00b300"> grade.</span></b><span style="color: #ff0000"><b> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie14" alt=":angelic:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></b></span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8359440, member: 24314"]BadThad, posted: [COLOR=#00b300]"You're overthinking it, [/COLOR][B][I][COLOR=#ff0000]it's simple[/COLOR][/I][/B][COLOR=#00b300] and also applies to[/COLOR] [COLOR=#b30000]to[/COLOR][COLOR=#5900b3]ni[/COLOR][COLOR=#b300b3]ng[/COLOR]." [I]I'm not overthinking anything.;) I just added a bunch of nonsense o_O to make a point. [B]ALL CONSERVATION [/B]is some form of cleaning, repairing. replacing, surface alteration, etc. Thus we are in 100% agreement -[B] [COLOR=#ff0000]it's simple.[/COLOR][/B] However, your example of toning is [B]NOT[/B] THE SAME AT ALL. :([/I] [COLOR=#00b300]"A coin is either considered market acceptable or not - regardless what you call about the journey there. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][I]"Market acceptability" is a TPGS :shifty: crutch to cover our butts because oxidation is either 100% natural (no matter how long it took) or not natural. Much of the time it is hard to know which it actually is. :jawdrop: The same cannot be said for conservation because in many cases of proper conservation the coin looks 100% natural as if it were never touched. So it is either CLEANED or NOT. Just because some cleaned coins are "market :shifty: acceptable" does not indicate they are not cleaned BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE THAT THEY HAVE BEEN CLEANED IS VISIBLE! :smuggrin:[/I][/COLOR] [COLOR=#00b300] That is why I much prefer to use the terms "cleaned" for not market acceptable and "conserved" for a market acceptable coin. It's a simple matter of colloquial nomenclature for convenience in discussion[/COLOR]. [I]You are free to use any words you wish. Just understand that the conserved coin has been altered - most often by a simple, undetectable cleaning.[/I] [I][B][COLOR=#ff0000]It's simple. [/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=#000000]As for the 1955-S 1c you asked me about... There is no way to determine the answer as you'll get opinions one way or the other by every famous, knowledgeable, professional numismatist, copper collector/dealer, etc. [/COLOR][/I] [COLOR=#000000][I]But I will not duck an honest question. [/I] [I][/I][/COLOR] [I][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]I do not like the two-toned coin and would not keep it. It looks chemically treated; however, (thanks for tipping it in the light) if it came into the grading room [/COLOR][/I][COLOR=#00b300]I should give it[/COLOR][B][COLOR=rgb(0, 179, 0)] [/COLOR][/B][COLOR=#00b300]a[/COLOR][B][COLOR=#00b300] high, straight, [/COLOR][COLOR=#ff8000]R[/COLOR][COLOR=#b35900]B[/COLOR][COLOR=#00b300] grade.[/COLOR][/B][COLOR=#ff0000][B] :angelic:[/B][/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
TPG Conservation of Nickel Coinage
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...