Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 1543713, member: 15309"]All I did was reiterate what Doug typed, nothing more. We are not discussing value grading.  It was never mentioned before the quote of Doug's from the other thread, and has only been mentioned here by you as a diversionary tactic in order to avoid the real issue. I asked you a very simple question and would appreciate an answer.  How can you point to the ANA standards as your basis for the "wear is wear" philosophy when the ANA standards themselves don't agree with you? Fine, provide a quote from the book. No spin doctor, it has nothing to do with "wear is wear" or the ANA standards An outright lie.  I have quoted the PCGS standards several times in this very thread.  NGC hasn't published their standards, so no it doesn't, just more spin! We only are going back and forth because you refuse to answer my questions and are just posting diversionary spin tactics to avoid the inevitable, admitting that you are wrong.  But considering your teacher, it does not surprise me.  If you want it to end, answer the question. How can you point to the ANA standards as your basis for the "wear is wear" philosophy when the ANA standards themselves don't agree with you.[/QUOTE]