Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
totally confused. difference between proof and ms?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="BUncirculated, post: 1543551, member: 29581"]Paul, try and keep up with me here. </p><p><br /></p><p>If a coin has any signs of wear, regardless of the cause, it is a circulated coin. If coin comes from a bank bag, with signs of wear, it is circulated. Why is it circulated? Because no one, not even the Gods of the TPGs, can determine how the wear came to be present. It could have been any type of friction, which is the direct cause of wear on a coin. </p><p><br /></p><p>FYI, I know you're a Jefferson guru, but with Morgans, there many millions of dollars worth that did make it into circulation. If you haven't read it, Bower's book on Morgans, it tells of this. How those dollars that made it into circulation wound up in bank bags, stored in the vaults at the Mint, and eventually the overflow into the Fed, is by the public exchanging them at banks for paper dollars. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>But in the same post, Doug stated this, which you omitted:</p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p>That criteria he states, he mentioned in post #33 in the same thread:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>That was in reply to mike's post:</p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><br /></p><p>Since we all know the inception of the TPGs was in the mid to late 80s, and the cut and paste I made from the PCGS's website from the article dated June 12, 1997, was a copy of the ANA's standards, which were before the TPGs inception, I don't see a collaborative effort between the two.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="BUncirculated, post: 1543551, member: 29581"]Paul, try and keep up with me here. If a coin has any signs of wear, regardless of the cause, it is a circulated coin. If coin comes from a bank bag, with signs of wear, it is circulated. Why is it circulated? Because no one, not even the Gods of the TPGs, can determine how the wear came to be present. It could have been any type of friction, which is the direct cause of wear on a coin. FYI, I know you're a Jefferson guru, but with Morgans, there many millions of dollars worth that did make it into circulation. If you haven't read it, Bower's book on Morgans, it tells of this. How those dollars that made it into circulation wound up in bank bags, stored in the vaults at the Mint, and eventually the overflow into the Fed, is by the public exchanging them at banks for paper dollars. But in the same post, Doug stated this, which you omitted: That criteria he states, he mentioned in post #33 in the same thread: That was in reply to mike's post: [COLOR=#000000] [/COLOR] Since we all know the inception of the TPGs was in the mid to late 80s, and the cut and paste I made from the PCGS's website from the article dated June 12, 1997, was a copy of the ANA's standards, which were before the TPGs inception, I don't see a collaborative effort between the two.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
totally confused. difference between proof and ms?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...