Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
totally confused. difference between proof and ms?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="BUncirculated, post: 1541795, member: 29581"]So you've been in everyone's pocket for each year of issue of a Saint to know not every one was in someone's pocket? Paul that's an assumption, that every Saint wasn't in someone's pocket. You can't state that as a fact unless you were in everyone's pocket when those were made.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Hypothetically, if it could be discerned, I would judge it much the same way as I judge high point wear on Morgans, Franklins, Washingtons, etc., etc. </p><p><br /></p><p>The term you're using "high point wear" happens on all coins. Typically, the high points of the design, show the first signs of wear because they are raised higher than the fields, and recesses of the design. </p><p><br /></p><p>Take the Morgan for example. The high points of the design are Liberty's hair, cotton boles, ear, the eagles breast, legs just to name a few. When determining any amount of wear, from any frictional source, those are considered to be the key focal areas, and the first place to look for signs of wear.</p><p><br /></p><p>Much like the Breast and knee on the Saints are the high points of the design. </p><p><br /></p><p>As far as knowing a coin has not been circulated, really there is only one true way to know that for certain and that's to receive the coin directly from Mint, or even stand next to the catch bin on the other side of the press, and grab several as they drop out from the dies. </p><p><br /></p><p>Depending on how much wear, AU at best.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="BUncirculated, post: 1541795, member: 29581"]So you've been in everyone's pocket for each year of issue of a Saint to know not every one was in someone's pocket? Paul that's an assumption, that every Saint wasn't in someone's pocket. You can't state that as a fact unless you were in everyone's pocket when those were made. Hypothetically, if it could be discerned, I would judge it much the same way as I judge high point wear on Morgans, Franklins, Washingtons, etc., etc. The term you're using "high point wear" happens on all coins. Typically, the high points of the design, show the first signs of wear because they are raised higher than the fields, and recesses of the design. Take the Morgan for example. The high points of the design are Liberty's hair, cotton boles, ear, the eagles breast, legs just to name a few. When determining any amount of wear, from any frictional source, those are considered to be the key focal areas, and the first place to look for signs of wear. Much like the Breast and knee on the Saints are the high points of the design. As far as knowing a coin has not been circulated, really there is only one true way to know that for certain and that's to receive the coin directly from Mint, or even stand next to the catch bin on the other side of the press, and grab several as they drop out from the dies. Depending on how much wear, AU at best.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
totally confused. difference between proof and ms?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...