Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BUncirculated, post: 1541237, member: 29581&quot;]<span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">You can get that same effect from coins rubbing against one another in your pocket, just so you know. I agree it&#039;s not a complete guess, in fact, it&#039;s not a guess at all. It&#039;s an assumption the friction is from coins being in a roll as opposed to one&#039;s pocket, either way, can produce the same results and appearance.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><br /></p><p>I disagree with it because PCGS wants to change the definition of wear and have exclusions for certain types of wear.&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I posted a link to an article, from their website, dated June 12, 1995, which you pointed out to me was from 1995. That article clearly states the standards that followed are the ANA standards, which I believe PCGS, as well as the other top TPGs followed. PCGS went their own way in 97 when they came out with their own grading standards. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>So you&#039;re saying they had no standards prior to 97? I agree![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in