Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 1539239, member: 112&quot;]Unfortunately, for you, every one of those things is true. And if you actually had any knowledge and experience, you would know that.</p><p>&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Yeah I know, all I did was agree with you. And as I recall, until I told you that, you didn&#039;t even know it.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Let&#039;s see, their grading book, page 47, right hand column, first paragraph - </p><p><br /></p><p><i>&quot;The element of grading is not just about the difference in AU58 and MS60 since there is slight or friction in grades <u><b>up to</b></u> MS67.&quot;</i></p><p><br /></p><p>In case you don&#039;t understand, &quot;up to&quot; means not above that.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>No Paul, they do it because collectors don&#039;t want to own AU coins, they want to own MS coins. So PCGS calls AU coins MS by using that excuse.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, I proved to you that they contradict themselves, and yet you still want to believe them. Go figure <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Wear is wear Paul, it doesn&#039;t matter where it comes from or how it got there, it is still wear. And by definition, if a coin has wear, then it is NOT MS.</p><p><br /></p><p>But you go right on ahead and believe what you want.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in