Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Top 10 of 2019 (From FitzNigel)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="FitzNigel, post: 3974182, member: 74712"]Well, I am a little late to the party, but I was waiting for some coins to arrive in the mail. And while this is a Top 10 (and maybe a little bit more), this actually represents all of my purchases for the year. It has been a slow one coin-wise, but I think I managed to grab a couple of gems.</p><p><br /></p><p>10. Huvishka Tetradrachm</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1045868[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Kushan Empire</font></p><p><font size="3">Huvishka, r. 155-189 A.D.</font></p><p><font size="3">AE Tetradrachm, 25.48 mm x 13.8 grams</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: Huvishka seated facing cross-legged, holding ankuśa (elephant goad) and scepter; trace of clouds below</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: Solar deity Mithra standing left, extending hand in benediction and holding hilt of sword; tamgha to left</font></p><p><br /></p><p>This was an impulse buy at a coin show. I like the mixing of culture that was taking place in Central Asia, and while this coin does not feature the Buddha, the king sitting cross-legged sure seems inspired by a coin featuring the Buddha minted by his predecessor.</p><p><br /></p><p>9. Al-Radi Billah Dirhem</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1045871[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Abbasid Caliphate, Third Period</font></p><p><font size="3">Al-Radi Billah, r. 322-329 AH/934-940 A.D. (324 AH/936/7 A.D.)</font></p><p><font size="3">AR Dirhem, 27.08 mm x 3.0 grams</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: Outer Margin: لله الأمر من قبل و من بعد ويومئذ يفرح المؤمنون بنصر الله. Inner Margin: بسم الله ضرب هذا الدرهم بمدينة السلام سنة اربع و عشرين و ثلث مائة. Center: لا شريك له / الله وحده / لا الاه الا </font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: Margin: محمد رسول الله ارسله بالهدى و دين الحق ليظهره على الدين كله ولو كره المشركون Center: د / الراضى بالله / الله / رسول / محمد / لله </font></p><p><font size="3">Ref.: Album 255.1 (Without Heir)</font></p><p><br /></p><p>I was interested in grabbing some coins related to the Viking age. The Vikings had trading contacts with the Abbasid Caliphate, and would use Dirhems such as this in trade, and as jewelry. While there is no way I can know if this coin was in the hands of the Vikings, the damage done to it is consistent with other dirhems found in Viking hoards.</p><p><br /></p><p>8. Caracalla Provincial from Stobi</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1045886[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Provincial Rome - Macedon</font></p><p><font size="3">Caracalla, r. 198-217 A.D.</font></p><p><font size="3">Stobi AE24, 23.9 mm x 5.82 grams</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: [...] ANTONINV, laureate, draped and cuirassed bust right</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: MVNICI STOB, Victory advancing left, holding palm frond and wreath</font></p><p><font size="3">Ex. Zumbly collection</font></p><p><br /></p><p>I have slowly been amassing a small hoard of provincial bronzes minted during the reign of Caracalla. I’ve been trying to focus on examples with unusual or interesting reverses. While this one is perhaps not the most unique, it was in excellent condition, for a good price, and has the highly prestigious provenance of being an ex [USER=57495]@zumbly[/USER] coin!</p><p><br /></p><p>7. A Trio of Norman Deniers</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1045877[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Left: </font></p><p><font size="3">Feudal France - Normandy</font></p><p><font size="3">William II-William Clito/Henry I, r. 1035-1135 (1075-1130)</font></p><p><font size="3">AR Denier, 19.65 mm x 0.8 grams</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: +NORMAN DVX. Cross pattee with pellets in angles</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: Degenerate chapel, pellet in pediment, two pellets and annulets to either side, pellet and greek cross underneath</font></p><p><font size="3">Ref.: Dumas XX-1, Roberts, 4833</font></p><p><font size="3">Note: Dumas group C et D according to Moesgaard</font></p><p><font size="3"><br /></font></p><p><font size="3">Center: </font></p><p><font size="3">Feudal France - Normandy</font></p><p><font size="3">William II-William Clito/Henry I, r. 1035-1135 (1075-1130)</font></p><p><font size="3">AR Denier, 16.70 mm x 0.5 grams</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: +NORMAN DVX. Cross pattee with pellets in angles</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: Cross around oval, crosslets on each arm, two pellets within</font></p><p><font size="3">Ref.: Dumas XX-19</font></p><p><font size="3">Note: Dumas group C et D according to Moesgaard</font></p><p><font size="3"><br /></font></p><p><font size="3">Right: </font></p><p><font size="3">Feudal France - Normandy</font></p><p><font size="3">William II-William Clito/Henry I, r. 1035-1135 (1075-1130)</font></p><p><font size="3">AR Denier, 16.62 mm x 0.6 grams</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: +NORMAN DVX. Cross pattee with pellets in angles</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: ROT’VM[AG?], around circle and V</font></p><p><font size="3">Ref.: Dumas XX-24</font></p><p><font size="3">Note: Dumas group C et D according to Moesgaard</font></p><p><br /></p><p>I bought the three of these deniers as a group from an eBay seller who could/did not identify them. And I don’t blame the seller! These late 10th/early 11th Century coins from Normandy tend to be in terrible condition, and not well documented. While I am confident I have correctly identified two of them, the third (on the right of this image) I am not as certain. (The William II under whom these coins might have been issued is William the Conqueror).</p><p><br /></p><p>6. Richard I of Normandy Denier </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1045881[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Feudal France - Normandy</font></p><p><font size="3">Richard I, r. 943-996</font></p><p><font size="3">AR Denier</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: +RICARDVS. Cross pattee with pellets in angles</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: +ROTOMAGVS. Lothaire monogram</font></p><p><font size="3">Ref.: Dumas XV-23, Duplessy 18</font></p><p><br /></p><p>I admittedly bought this coin to ease the pain of shipping another coin (#1 on this list), but it was a variety I wanted, and for a reasonable price. While the coin has Richard’s name on it, the reverse contains a monogram which is not Richard’s. CNG says this is a monogram of Lothaire’s, but I haven’t yet found the research which backs this (I have several sources I still need to wade through). Nonetheless, it is a fun little mystery that I will eventually delve into.</p><p><br /></p><p>5. Caracalla Provincial from Soloi-Pompeiopolis</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1045875[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Provincial Rome - Cilicia</font></p><p><font size="3">Caracalla, r. 198-217 A.D.</font></p><p><font size="3">Soloi-Pompeiopolis mint, AE33, 32.91mm x 16.37 grams</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: Laureate, draped and cuirassed bust right</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: Bust of astronomer Aratos (?) right</font></p><p><br /></p><p>As with number 8, here is another Caracalla Provincial with an unusual reverse. This is presumably the bust of the poet Aratus who became famous for writing a poem describing the stars and constellations. A crater on the moon (near the Apollo 15 landing site) was named after him, and his tomb was discovered in Turkey earlier this year. There do not seem to be many issues of this coin that survive (mine was advertised as the second known, but I’ve found at least 4 just by looking online), but another factor which made it an attractive buy is because it is BIG (did I mention under #8 that big bronzes were also what I’m looking for?)</p><p><br /></p><p>4. Caracalla Provincial from Perinthus</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1045888[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Provincial Rome - Thrace</font></p><p><font size="3">Caracalla, r. 198-217 A.D.</font></p><p><font size="3">Perinthus, AE 35 Medallion, 35.30 mm x 26.52 grams</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: [AVT K M AVP CЄ]OVHP ANTΩNINOC AVΓ, radiate head right</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: ΠЄPINΘIΩN NEΩKOPΩN, agonistic table surmounted by two prize urns, each containing palm; below, five balls and amphora</font></p><p><br /></p><p>Okay, another one. I had hoped to add one Caracalla this year, but three grabbed me. This is another big bronze with an interesting reverse. I’m thankful for @Dougsmith’s page explaining just what an agonistic table was. Unfortunately I do not know what this coin is meant to be commemorating - I believe it is written at the top in Greek, but I can’t quite make it out (nor do I know Greekwell enough to postulate). Regardless, this is a nice, large, and hefty bronze.</p><p><br /></p><p>3. Richard I of Normandy Denier</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1045891[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Feudal France - Normandy</font></p><p><font size="3">Richard I, r. 943-996</font></p><p><font size="3">AR Denier, 21.1 mm x 1.3 grams</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: +RICARDVS I. Cross pattee with pellets in angles</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: ROTOMAGVS. Stylized chapel made from St. Andrew’s cross, with a pellet in the pediment</font></p><p><font size="3">Ref.: Dumas XV-11, Duplessy 16</font></p><p><br /></p><p>The coins of Richard I are probably the most common type collectors find from Normandy. Of the numerous types minted by Richard, this ‘temple’ type with the Saint Andrews Cross in the Middle seems to be the most common on the market these days. The type itself has two varieties: one with a pellet in the pediment, and one without (I think there a few other varieties on the legend, but that is not uncommon). While my example is perhaps not the most pristine, it was a good price for the condition, and fills a glaring hole in my growing focus on the coins of Normandy.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. Æthelred II Penny</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1045895[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">England</font></p><p><font size="3">Athelred II, r. 978-1016 (997-1003)</font></p><p><font size="3">AR Penny, 19.65 mm x 1.8 grams</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: +ÆÐELREDREXANGLO[rum]. Bare-headed bust left</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: +LEO FRIC MΩO CENT. Voided long cross, each end terminating in three crescents</font></p><p><font size="3">Ref.: SCBC 1151</font></p><p><font size="3">Note: Peck marked and holed, likely by the Vikings</font></p><p><br /></p><p>Like #9, I had been on the lookout for a few coins related to the Vikings this year. I knew I wanted to grab an Æthelred that had peck-marks on it, but this one was also holed, much like the Abbasid coin (which also aided in keeping costs down). I will want to get a better example of this and another of Æthelred’s coins because of the interesting writing on it. Not only does it feature the Anglo-Saxon letter ‘Ð/ð’ it also has a combining abbreviation for the plural genitive ‘orum.’ The ‘o’ is visible, the ‘2’ that comes after the ‘o’ is an ‘r,’ and then the line through the ‘2’ (which makes it look like an ‘x’ as it is recorded in several Numismatic works) is the standard abbreviation for ‘um.’ When I have a better example, I’ll delve into the rabbit hole of Numismatic Palaeography...</p><p><br /></p><p>1. Bratislaus Denar</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1045896[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Bohemia</font></p><p><font size="3">Bretislaus I, r. 1034-1055 (1050-55)</font></p><p><font size="3">Prague Mint, AR Denar</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv.: BRACIZLAVS DVX. Bust facing, a pellet to either side</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev.: SCS WENCEZLAVS. Bust right, cross to right</font></p><p><font size="3">Ref.: Frynas, B.8.15; De Wit 2719</font></p><p><br /></p><p>This is the coin I was waiting to arrive in the mail before posting my list (a full write-up is forthcoming). It is a type I had been wanting for a while, and while these coins are technically common, I haven’t found many for sale. I was happy to snatch one at the last minute, and was lucky it arrived before the end of the year![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="FitzNigel, post: 3974182, member: 74712"]Well, I am a little late to the party, but I was waiting for some coins to arrive in the mail. And while this is a Top 10 (and maybe a little bit more), this actually represents all of my purchases for the year. It has been a slow one coin-wise, but I think I managed to grab a couple of gems. 10. Huvishka Tetradrachm [ATTACH=full]1045868[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Kushan Empire Huvishka, r. 155-189 A.D. AE Tetradrachm, 25.48 mm x 13.8 grams Obv.: Huvishka seated facing cross-legged, holding ankuśa (elephant goad) and scepter; trace of clouds below Rev.: Solar deity Mithra standing left, extending hand in benediction and holding hilt of sword; tamgha to left[/SIZE] This was an impulse buy at a coin show. I like the mixing of culture that was taking place in Central Asia, and while this coin does not feature the Buddha, the king sitting cross-legged sure seems inspired by a coin featuring the Buddha minted by his predecessor. 9. Al-Radi Billah Dirhem [ATTACH=full]1045871[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Abbasid Caliphate, Third Period Al-Radi Billah, r. 322-329 AH/934-940 A.D. (324 AH/936/7 A.D.) AR Dirhem, 27.08 mm x 3.0 grams Obv.: Outer Margin: لله الأمر من قبل و من بعد ويومئذ يفرح المؤمنون بنصر الله. Inner Margin: بسم الله ضرب هذا الدرهم بمدينة السلام سنة اربع و عشرين و ثلث مائة. Center: لا شريك له / الله وحده / لا الاه الا Rev.: Margin: محمد رسول الله ارسله بالهدى و دين الحق ليظهره على الدين كله ولو كره المشركون Center: د / الراضى بالله / الله / رسول / محمد / لله Ref.: Album 255.1 (Without Heir)[/SIZE] I was interested in grabbing some coins related to the Viking age. The Vikings had trading contacts with the Abbasid Caliphate, and would use Dirhems such as this in trade, and as jewelry. While there is no way I can know if this coin was in the hands of the Vikings, the damage done to it is consistent with other dirhems found in Viking hoards. 8. Caracalla Provincial from Stobi [ATTACH=full]1045886[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Provincial Rome - Macedon Caracalla, r. 198-217 A.D. Stobi AE24, 23.9 mm x 5.82 grams Obv.: [...] ANTONINV, laureate, draped and cuirassed bust right Rev.: MVNICI STOB, Victory advancing left, holding palm frond and wreath Ex. Zumbly collection[/SIZE] I have slowly been amassing a small hoard of provincial bronzes minted during the reign of Caracalla. I’ve been trying to focus on examples with unusual or interesting reverses. While this one is perhaps not the most unique, it was in excellent condition, for a good price, and has the highly prestigious provenance of being an ex [USER=57495]@zumbly[/USER] coin! 7. A Trio of Norman Deniers [ATTACH=full]1045877[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Left: Feudal France - Normandy William II-William Clito/Henry I, r. 1035-1135 (1075-1130) AR Denier, 19.65 mm x 0.8 grams Obv.: +NORMAN DVX. Cross pattee with pellets in angles Rev.: Degenerate chapel, pellet in pediment, two pellets and annulets to either side, pellet and greek cross underneath Ref.: Dumas XX-1, Roberts, 4833 Note: Dumas group C et D according to Moesgaard Center: Feudal France - Normandy William II-William Clito/Henry I, r. 1035-1135 (1075-1130) AR Denier, 16.70 mm x 0.5 grams Obv.: +NORMAN DVX. Cross pattee with pellets in angles Rev.: Cross around oval, crosslets on each arm, two pellets within Ref.: Dumas XX-19 Note: Dumas group C et D according to Moesgaard Right: Feudal France - Normandy William II-William Clito/Henry I, r. 1035-1135 (1075-1130) AR Denier, 16.62 mm x 0.6 grams Obv.: +NORMAN DVX. Cross pattee with pellets in angles Rev.: ROT’VM[AG?], around circle and V Ref.: Dumas XX-24 Note: Dumas group C et D according to Moesgaard[/SIZE] I bought the three of these deniers as a group from an eBay seller who could/did not identify them. And I don’t blame the seller! These late 10th/early 11th Century coins from Normandy tend to be in terrible condition, and not well documented. While I am confident I have correctly identified two of them, the third (on the right of this image) I am not as certain. (The William II under whom these coins might have been issued is William the Conqueror). 6. Richard I of Normandy Denier [ATTACH=full]1045881[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Feudal France - Normandy Richard I, r. 943-996 AR Denier Obv.: +RICARDVS. Cross pattee with pellets in angles Rev.: +ROTOMAGVS. Lothaire monogram Ref.: Dumas XV-23, Duplessy 18[/SIZE] I admittedly bought this coin to ease the pain of shipping another coin (#1 on this list), but it was a variety I wanted, and for a reasonable price. While the coin has Richard’s name on it, the reverse contains a monogram which is not Richard’s. CNG says this is a monogram of Lothaire’s, but I haven’t yet found the research which backs this (I have several sources I still need to wade through). Nonetheless, it is a fun little mystery that I will eventually delve into. 5. Caracalla Provincial from Soloi-Pompeiopolis [ATTACH=full]1045875[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Provincial Rome - Cilicia Caracalla, r. 198-217 A.D. Soloi-Pompeiopolis mint, AE33, 32.91mm x 16.37 grams Obv.: Laureate, draped and cuirassed bust right Rev.: Bust of astronomer Aratos (?) right[/SIZE] As with number 8, here is another Caracalla Provincial with an unusual reverse. This is presumably the bust of the poet Aratus who became famous for writing a poem describing the stars and constellations. A crater on the moon (near the Apollo 15 landing site) was named after him, and his tomb was discovered in Turkey earlier this year. There do not seem to be many issues of this coin that survive (mine was advertised as the second known, but I’ve found at least 4 just by looking online), but another factor which made it an attractive buy is because it is BIG (did I mention under #8 that big bronzes were also what I’m looking for?) 4. Caracalla Provincial from Perinthus [ATTACH=full]1045888[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Provincial Rome - Thrace Caracalla, r. 198-217 A.D. Perinthus, AE 35 Medallion, 35.30 mm x 26.52 grams Obv.: [AVT K M AVP CЄ]OVHP ANTΩNINOC AVΓ, radiate head right Rev.: ΠЄPINΘIΩN NEΩKOPΩN, agonistic table surmounted by two prize urns, each containing palm; below, five balls and amphora[/SIZE] Okay, another one. I had hoped to add one Caracalla this year, but three grabbed me. This is another big bronze with an interesting reverse. I’m thankful for @Dougsmith’s page explaining just what an agonistic table was. Unfortunately I do not know what this coin is meant to be commemorating - I believe it is written at the top in Greek, but I can’t quite make it out (nor do I know Greekwell enough to postulate). Regardless, this is a nice, large, and hefty bronze. 3. Richard I of Normandy Denier [ATTACH=full]1045891[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Feudal France - Normandy Richard I, r. 943-996 AR Denier, 21.1 mm x 1.3 grams Obv.: +RICARDVS I. Cross pattee with pellets in angles Rev.: ROTOMAGVS. Stylized chapel made from St. Andrew’s cross, with a pellet in the pediment Ref.: Dumas XV-11, Duplessy 16[/SIZE] The coins of Richard I are probably the most common type collectors find from Normandy. Of the numerous types minted by Richard, this ‘temple’ type with the Saint Andrews Cross in the Middle seems to be the most common on the market these days. The type itself has two varieties: one with a pellet in the pediment, and one without (I think there a few other varieties on the legend, but that is not uncommon). While my example is perhaps not the most pristine, it was a good price for the condition, and fills a glaring hole in my growing focus on the coins of Normandy. 2. Æthelred II Penny [ATTACH=full]1045895[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]England Athelred II, r. 978-1016 (997-1003) AR Penny, 19.65 mm x 1.8 grams Obv.: +ÆÐELREDREXANGLO[rum]. Bare-headed bust left Rev.: +LEO FRIC MΩO CENT. Voided long cross, each end terminating in three crescents Ref.: SCBC 1151 Note: Peck marked and holed, likely by the Vikings[/SIZE] Like #9, I had been on the lookout for a few coins related to the Vikings this year. I knew I wanted to grab an Æthelred that had peck-marks on it, but this one was also holed, much like the Abbasid coin (which also aided in keeping costs down). I will want to get a better example of this and another of Æthelred’s coins because of the interesting writing on it. Not only does it feature the Anglo-Saxon letter ‘Ð/ð’ it also has a combining abbreviation for the plural genitive ‘orum.’ The ‘o’ is visible, the ‘2’ that comes after the ‘o’ is an ‘r,’ and then the line through the ‘2’ (which makes it look like an ‘x’ as it is recorded in several Numismatic works) is the standard abbreviation for ‘um.’ When I have a better example, I’ll delve into the rabbit hole of Numismatic Palaeography... 1. Bratislaus Denar [ATTACH=full]1045896[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Bohemia Bretislaus I, r. 1034-1055 (1050-55) Prague Mint, AR Denar Obv.: BRACIZLAVS DVX. Bust facing, a pellet to either side Rev.: SCS WENCEZLAVS. Bust right, cross to right Ref.: Frynas, B.8.15; De Wit 2719[/SIZE] This is the coin I was waiting to arrive in the mail before posting my list (a full write-up is forthcoming). It is a type I had been wanting for a while, and while these coins are technically common, I haven’t found many for sale. I was happy to snatch one at the last minute, and was lucky it arrived before the end of the year![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Top 10 of 2019 (From FitzNigel)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...