Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;chip, post: 772311, member: 19122&quot;]Sorry, I was called to breakfast. My answer was only partial.</p><p><br /></p><p>It seems to me that where at offends is when its art overrides the art of the coin itself, but it is not&nbsp; the same as hobo nickels, which also use coins as a canvas, I think because a hobo nickel does not purport to be the coin itself. </p><p><br /></p><p>The coin itself is artificial but nobody would say differently, but at pretends to a natural process, where I would have no qualms with at is if the coin was produced and attributed as such, in the same way that hobo nickels are. </p><p><br /></p><p>Probably as clear as mud but the idea is not mature.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in