Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 412172, member: 4920&quot;]So all in a day&#039;s work. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> At least, that&#039;s consistent. Just to nail this down, please take a look at these two &#039;44-S cent sets. As you can see, the untoned set technically grades higher than the toned set. However, just assume the toning in the toned set is &quot;eye-appealing.&quot; I can see somebody conceivably thinking that, anyway, as it does have interesting coloring and distribution (...and my poor pictures, really, don&#039;t do that complete justice, just trust me on that). In effect, then, this toned &#039;44-S can achieve the same market grade as this untoned example? I guess I understand that from your answer, but I&#039;m looking to confirm it. This isn&#039;t a trick question, though, I hope you know I don&#039;t clown like that. Thanks.</p><p><br /></p><p>Oops, forgot to include the reverses. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie9" alt=":eek:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> But I think we&#039;ll just save the bandwidth on those because they&#039;re not really necessary to answer the question...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in