Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;AussieCollector, post: 8397963, member: 81093&quot;]I agree.</p><p><br /></p><p>Surely whether toning is viewed as acceptable or not should not rely on the &quot;intent&quot; of the toning.</p><p><br /></p><p>Toning is toning, and is a result of a chemical reaction. </p><p><br /></p><p>If it comes down to the intent of the owner, it would result in ridiculous situations like a coin kept in a cabinet for safe keeping 100 years ago being acceptable, but not a coin that was intentionally put into a cabinet to tone - which would be unacceptable. Exact same process, but the intent of the action was different.</p><p><br /></p><p>I say, be like Elsa and let it go. Who cares. Let the toning be toning.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in