Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 26565779, member: 19165&quot;]John - I would say that, while it might be original, it also has fingerprints. In my own personal opinion and evaluation of eye appeal, I&#039;d much rather have a coin that was properly dipped and has regained toning over a coin with fingerprints. I personally find them distinctly unattractive and won&#039;t buy one unless there is no other choice. But, on the flip side, it doesn&#039;t bother a lot of people and they buy them anyways. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As for the OP&#039;s coin... I don&#039;t see any hairlines, but the consensus is almost definitely dipped and retoned. It looks attractive - but it has to be at the right price. Asking slabbed AU price for a raw coin with some issues... I&#039;d probably pass on that one unless you can bargain the seller down.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in