Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2419621, member: 1892&quot;]We agree. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>I wrote that wall of text to explain why what *could* look like wear in C-B-D&#039;s original images might not be - knowing that, I have no opinion from these images whether it&#039;s actually wear or not - and just figured PCGS based the 58 on the marks and not necessarily what they saw as &quot;wear.&quot; </p><p><br /></p><p>58&#039;s - to me - don&#039;t necessarily have to show &quot;wear.&quot; Marks which an experienced evaluator would reasonably conclude could have only come from circulation are enough. Kinda the point of an AU58.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in