Toned British Six/Threepence New Acquisitions

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by Mark Metzger, Dec 6, 2018.

  1. Mark Metzger

    Mark Metzger Well-Known Member

    Here are some particularly attractive toners that were part of a larger lot I acquired today. They were in a dansko binder but I think the toning came from another source as not all pieces were toned this way. Lemme know what you think!
    IMG_20181206_193532.jpg IMG_20181206_193544.jpg IMG_20181206_193555.jpg IMG_20181206_193605.jpg IMG_20181206_193514.jpg IMG_20181206_193523.jpg IMG_20181206_193433.jpg IMG_20181206_193452.jpg IMG_20181206_193442.jpg IMG_20181206_193506.jpg
     
    Bayern, Paul M., Jasanche and 2 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Those are some really nice toners.

    These all have classic-old time toning, but definitely not Dansco. Older Danscos will tone coins, but not in that pattern. That is a type of toning we often call "envelope toning" - from the small 2x2 manila envelopes that many collectors stored coins in.

    The 3pences are Maundy, right? Do those usually come circulated? I thought those were special issues.
     
  4. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Guardian of The Farce, & Dead-Eye Master

    All 19th century and early 20th 3 pence silver had the same design as Maundy. Only the finish was different. All these shown seem circulation version.
     
  5. Mark Metzger

    Mark Metzger Well-Known Member

    I did a bit of reading on the issue and apparently it's quite tough to tell the difference. @V. Kurt Bellman is there a trick or a telltale sign?
     
  6. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Guardian of The Farce, & Dead-Eye Master

    It's almost like distinguishing Barber proofs from really nice BU's. There is a quasi-mirrored field on the Maundy version. The devices are ultra-sharp. SOMETIMES really thick toning can mask a Maundy. I would consider the 1897 a candidate, without the benefit of lighting swirl.

    Of course, hanging around with a 1, 2 and 4 is pretty convincing.
     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2018
    Bayern and Paul M. like this.
  7. Mark Metzger

    Mark Metzger Well-Known Member

    Any thoughts on grade of the 1897 or 1912? Those are obviously the two nicest of the bunch.
     
  8. Bayern

    Bayern New Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page