Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 2236090, member: 19165&quot;]The copper molecules and the gold molecules are acting independently of each other. The copper isn&#039;t toning the gold, and the gold isn&#039;t impeding the copper from reacting. What one molecule is doing has absolutely no impact on what the other molecule is doing. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Very attractive coins. What was the actual purity? I&#039;ll bet it wasn&#039;t 100% (because that isn&#039;t possible). Based on my understanding of the technology of the time, the best they could get was 0.99 - which still leaves an awful lot of copper atoms left over. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>That is an incredibly bold claim to make. Science is formed of hypothesis, research, experimentation, and conclusion. Are you saying you know more than the scientists who have researched this? I know gold coins tone, I&#039;m not arguing that with you - but the gold itself is not what is reacting. </p><p><br /></p><p>You still have not provided a logical and reasonable scientific explanation for your hypothesis. What compounds are being formed by the gold? How is it doing that? I need more proof than &quot;Because I say so.&quot; Until then, I&#039;m going to side with science.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in