Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 1322429, member: 19065&quot;]These may be better classified as <b>&quot;re-straps</b>&quot; unless new from sealed bricks, therefore none are going to be ChCU. As much as notes pass through a casino (of all &quot;careless&quot; places), the hands put all over the paper, money counters bumping edges, dirty surfaces, cashiers, customers, dealers... come on. </p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>2006 $1 fancy (?) L 75 80 80 76 L</b> --- This is not a fancy SN just because it <i>looks</i> close to you. Well at least you threw in a question (?) mark with it. You really should question it more. You really have an imagination that likes to stretch these numismatic definitions. </p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>2009 $1 trinary D57733757A - CHCU&nbsp; --- </b>highly unlikely it&#039;s ChCU unless taken straight from a brand new strap, so was it a new strap or does it just &quot;look&quot; like it might be ChCU so the old &#039;horse shoes and hand grendades&#039; evaluation is good enough?</p><p><br /></p><p>These threads are very weak without images... <i>lets see some</i>! :thumb:[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in