Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 4026660, member: 19165&quot;]Honestly, this is how I&#039;ve always approached the Star.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, after a discussion with Mark Salzberg a couple of weeks ago at FUN, my perspective has changed.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Star is not, and has never been, about what *I* consider eye appealing. Or what *you* consider eye appealing.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Star has *always* been about what Mark Salzberg considers eye appealing - and that is literally the only criteria there is. If your eye is close to his, you&#039;ll be more aligned to the star. There are some that we can all agree on, and there are some we can all disagree on. However, the Star is all about what Mark Salzberg likes. And that&#039;s it, like it or not. (I&#039;m not saying I&#039;ve figured out what Mark likes and what will star, but his explanation of his philosophy about the Star has helped me understand quite a bit more). </p><p><br /></p><p>This is *very* similar to the whole CAC debate about John Albanese - the green bean is awarded if John likes it, if he doesn&#039;t like it then no bean for you.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in