I have a couple, let me know when its my turn. As for the Morgan - it is beautiful. No arguing there. However, that thicker toning tends to mute the luster. It seems like to get a star, you have to have blazing luster. Based on what I'm seeing, I just don't think it *pops* enough for a Star.
Any coin that is going to drive a premium that equates to multiples of price guide by definition has to have exceptional eye appeal. This coin should be a no brainer star coin.
Yes on Star. I like the golden and magenta color, however, I would pass on this one with dark rainbows colors.
Anyone else? We're at a tie right now on the Morgan. @heavycam.monstervam @jtlee321 @EyeAppealingCoins
Summary: Rd. 1: 1955-S MS 64 1c (NO Star) --> Should it star? -->Yes: 2 vs No: 11 Rd. 2: 1885-O MS 65 $1 (NO Star) —> Should it star? —> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Totals: No Star currently on holder, but deserves it: 1 No Star currently on holder and doesn't deserve it: 1 Star currently on holder and deserves it: 0 Star currently on holder, but doesn't deserve it: 0
Looks like the previous one wasn’t getting much action so I’ll call it. I’m cases of a tie (like here), the original poster gets to break the tie (so I voted yes it deserves a star based on the colors and eye appeal). @Lehigh96 you can post the next example @physics-fan3.14 you are up after Lehigh
Am I supposed to say whether it currently has a star or not? I feel like not posting it's current status gives a more unbiased opinion - and I'll reveal its status at the end.
@physics-fan3.14 not revealing the star status sounds like a good idea to prevent some bias. For the half, I think it is very nice (especially for the series). I’m not sold on the star as it seems a bit dark. I wouldn’t be against giving it a star, but I’ll vote for no star.
It is a gorgeous bust half, but no star for me. It is a little dark. Nevertheless I admire its originality.