To dip or not to dip: That is the question.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by jtlee321, Mar 28, 2017.

  1. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    So I picked up another 1955 Proof Set in the box. The Franklin looks to have very decent cameo on the obverse, the reverse I can see the texture of the cameo through the purplish/blue toning but the toning is subduing the appearance of the cameo.

    Now had the toning been much more spectacular, I wouldn't consider dipping it to bring out the cameo on the reverse. However, the toning is not terrible and the amount of cameo on the reverse may not be what I hope.

    So what would you do? Dip it or leave it?

    1955-Franklin-Half-Dollar-Obverse-Axial.jpg 1955-Franklin-Half-Dollar-Obverse-Standard.jpg 1955-Franklin-Half-Dollar-Reverse-Axial.jpg
     
    BadThad likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

  4. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    It's a pretty coin as is. You won't improve it's look.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  5. rmpsrpms

    rmpsrpms Lincoln Maniac

    You're kidding, right?
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  6. Yankee42

    Yankee42 Well-Known Member

    Leave it be
     
    DUSITN HADDOCK likes this.
  7. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Let's just say there was a big voice telling me not to. And a much smaller and weaker one saying do it. But I resisted and so far you guy's are confirming my feelings on it as well. So, no I will not dip this one. It is a beauty on it's own with the purple reverse. :)
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  8. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Funny thing is, this is the only coin in the set that is toned. The other's were all very nearly bright white. The nickel has a very nice golden tone to it, which I much prefer.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  9. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I am going to start another thread to show the rest of the coins that were in the set. They were all pretty nice. :)
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  10. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    I'd choose this one over a white one.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  11. rmpsrpms

    rmpsrpms Lincoln Maniac

    No question...it is a beauty.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  12. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    I had a very similar 1954 Franklin Proof and I dipped it......my advice: Don't dip it!!!!
     
  13. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    It's been placed on the endangered species list. It will live a protected life as long as I own it. Which may not be too long.
     
  14. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    leave it as is.
     
  15. DysfunctionalVeteran

    DysfunctionalVeteran Oddly enough

    Why not chrome plate it too?

    Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
     
  16. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I know it was a dumb question in retrospect. We all have DS moments. LOL.
     
    mynamespat likes this.
  17. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Justin leave it be..... nice coin as is.
     
  18. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    after you dip it you may as well use some silver polish on it to.
     
  19. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Variety Nerd

    If you dip that you shall be banished to the CT Badlands... Ancients
     
  20. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    A guy who literally SIGNS his coin photos has to ask whether he should touch this'n? No. Now, if I had some magic stuff that might bring back the reverse mirrors a little without touching the obverse? Yeah, THAT would tempt me.
     
  21. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    You've apparently already decided against it, but for the future remember this. In most cases, if it does anything, dipping a coin will reduce the cameo effect.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page