Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 4207889, member: 19165&quot;]The press says that it is an A or B coin, not a C. Thus, it would stand to reason that 66%&nbsp; of coins should get a CAC (making a certain set of assumptions, of course). Experience has shown this is not the case. CAC claims that it just has to be not low-end. However, nowhere near 66% of coins submitted are CAC&#039;d, as you&#039;d expect from a normal distribution! </p><p><br /></p><p>The market tends to treat CAC coins as premium coins. Is this correct? Is this the point of this thread? Is there any objective answer to this question? Nobody knows! </p><p><br /></p><p>CAC should be identifying accurately graded coins. However, CAC coins often receive a premium over non-CAC coins. I feel like many feel like there has been a self-feedback loop and because the market values CAC coins higher the CAC sticker has become more important and is thus applied to premium coins and so CAC coins are worth more and so more coins are submitted to CAC and the coins that sticker are given a premium. </p><p><br /></p><p>This isn&#039;t true, strictly speaking (or, it shouldn&#039;t be true). </p><p><br /></p><p>I agree the Walker in question is accurately graded at 65. It just doesn&#039;t strike me as a &quot;CAC coin.&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in