To CAC or not to CAC - official game thread

They're mega tough to get gold...and you can always check the video on my IG

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Gold on the peace dollar. That’s at least a 65. Great luster and minimal marks. I was at green in the cbh. There was a touch of wear and some circulation marks so 58 the right grade. But a pretty one. Would need to be a solid unc for gold and I don’t think it was

 

Gold on the peace

 

I think the Peace is undergraded, so give that puppy a gold sticker.

 

Green Bean

 

Man, I was really hoping it would get one and I did speak to JA about it. It almost made it, but one too many contact marks.

 

Pop 2

 

Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3

Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8

Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65 Gold CAC 50c--> Yes: 10 (8 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 0

Rd. 4: 1838 AU 58 Green CAC (Gold $5)--> Yes: 1 vs No: 5

Rd. 5: 1908 MS 63 Green CAC (Gold $20)—> Yes: 5 vs No: 1

Rd. 6: 1885-CC MS 63 PL Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1

Rd. 7: 1946-S MS 66 Green CAC Walker 50c--> Yes: 7 (6 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1

Rd. 8: 1885-S MS 62 NOT CAC Morgan--> Yes: 5 (4 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1

Rd. 9: 1830 EF 45 UNKNOWN CAC 50c--> Yes: 10 vs No: 1

Rd. 10*: 1899 MS 65 BN UNKNOWN CAC 1c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 5

Rd. 11: 1942 MS 65 Gold CAC 50c--> Yes: 4 (4 Green and 0 Gold) vs No: 2

Rd. 12: 1940-D MS 67 Star UNKNOWN CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4

Rd. 13*: 1884-O MS 61 Gold CAC $1--> Yes: 9 (4 Green and 5 Gold) vs No: 0

Rd. 14: 1827 AU 55 CAC 10c--> Yes: 1 vs No: 7

Rd. 15: 1851 MS 66 CAC 1c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 4

Rd. 16: 1919-S MS 65 Green CAC 10c--> Yes: 12 (11 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 0

Rd. 17: 1922 MS 65 NOT CAC Peace $1--> Yes: 10 vs No: 1

Rd. 18: 1851 Au 58+ CAC 1/2C--> Yes: 0 vs No: 6

Rd. 19: 1839-O AU 53 NO CAC 50c--> Yes: 6 (5 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 3

Rd. 20: 1920 MS 65 NO CAC 25c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 6

Rd. 21: 1862 PF 64 CAC H10c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 1

Rd. 22: 1869 PF 63 Gold CAC 10c--> Yes: 7 (5 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 0

Rd. 23: 1834 XF 45 CAC $5--> Yes: 2 vs No: 5

Rd. 24: 1835 XF 40 CAC 25c--> Yes: 8 (7 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 2

Rd. 25: 1876 MS 62 Not CAC 50c--> Yes: 7 (6 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1

Rd. 26: 1853 MS 64 Not CAC 10c--> Yes: 7 vs No: 0

Rd. 27: 1913 MS 62 CAC 2.5 Gold--> Yes: 1 vs No: 5

Rd. 28: 1835 AU 58 CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 7

Rd. 29: 1908-S MS 64 CAC 1c--> Yes: 9 vs No: 2

Rd. 30: 1913-D MS 66+ CAC 5c--> Yes: 10 vs No: 0

Rd. 31: 1829 AU 55 NOT CAC 5c--> Yes: 11 vs No: 1

Rd. 32: 1851 MS 61 CAC 2.5 Gold--> Yes: 4 (3 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 2

Rd. 33: 1936-D MS 66 GOLD CAC 5c--> Yes: 3 (3 Green) vs No: 2

Rd. 34: 1941-S AU 55 NOT CAC 10c--> Yes: 11 (2 Green and 9 Gold) vs No: 0

Rd. 35: 1924 MS 66 CAC 25c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4

Rd. 36: 1936-D MS 67 Texas UNKNOWN CAC 50c--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1

Rd. 37: 1928 MS 66 Oregon UNKNOWN CAC 50c--> Yes: 9 vs No: 0

Rd. 38: 1893 MS 64 Isabella CAC 25c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 9

Rd. 39: 1820 AU 58 CAC 10c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 7

Rd. 40: 1881-S MS 65 CAC $1--> Yes: 7 (3 Green and 4 Gold) vs No: 0

Rd. 41: 1940 PR 66 CAC 50c--> Yes: 7 vs No: 0

Rd. 42: 1824 AU 50 CAC 50c--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1

Rd. 43: 1937 Texas MS 66 CAC 50c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 2

Rd. 44: 1903 PR 63 NOT CAC 50c--> Yes: 9 vs No: 1

Rd. 45: 1857 MS 64 CAC 10c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 6

Rd. 46: 1828 MS 62 CAC 10c--> Yes: 8 vs No: 1

Rd. 47: 1958 MS 67 FBL CAC 50c--> Yes: 1 vs No: 9

Rd. 48: 1902 PR 64 NOT CAC 50c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4

Rd. 49: 1832 AU 58 CAC 1/2c--> Yes: 5 (1 gold) vs No: 4

Rd. 50: 1902 PF 61 CAC 25c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 2

Rd. 51: 1953-D MS 66+ FBL CAC 50c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 4

Rd. 52: 1880 MS 64 CAC $1--> Yes: 3 vs No: 2

Rd. 53: 1882-CC MS 62 CAC $1--> Yes: 5 vs No: 1

Rd. 54: 1892 MS 64 Columbian CAC 50c--> Yes: 5 vs No: 0

Rd. 55: 1895-O VF 20 CAC $1--> Yes: 1 vs No: 6

Rd. 56: 1880-O MS 64 Not CAC $1--> Yes: 11 vs No: 0

Rd. 57: 1954 PF 65 CAM Gold CAC 50c--> Yes: 7 (7 Green and 0 Gold) vs No: 1

Rd. 58: 1879-S MS 65 CAC $1--> Yes: 5 vs No: 2

Rd. 59: 1949 MS 66+ FBL CAC 50c--> Yes: 3 vs No: 5

Rd. 60: 1880-S MS 66 PL Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 5 vs No: 7

Rd. 61: 1936 MS 67+ Green CAC York 50c--> Yes: 4 vs No: 5

Rd. 62: 1823/2 AU 58 CAC 10c--> Yes: 6 vs No: 3

Rd. 63: 1920 MS 65 CAC Pilgrim 50c--> Yes: 7 vs No: 4

Rd. 64: 1901/0-S XF 45 GOLD CAC Gold $5--> Yes: 7 (5 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 2

Rd. 65: 1937-D Texas MS 66 CAC 50c--> Yes: 12 vs No: 1

Rd. 66: 1829 AU 55 CAC 50c--> Yes: 8 vs No: 2

Rd. 67: 1859 PR 62 Gold CAC H10c--> Yes: 7 (6 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 1

Rd. 68: 1883-O MS 62 CAC $1--> Yes: 2 vs No: 5

Rd. 69: 1818 AU 50 NOT CAC 50c--> Yes: 10 vs No: 1

Rd. 70: 1828 F 12 NOT CAC 25c--> Yes: 7 vs No: 1

Rd. 71: 1882-S MS 67 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 2

Rd. 72: 1879 PR 65 CAM Green CAC 3CN--> Yes: 2 vs No: 5

Rd. 73: 1809 XF 40 CAC 50c--> Yes: 5 (4 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 4

Rd. 74: 1879-S MS 64 Gold CAC $1--> Yes: 10 (9 Green and 1 Gold) vs No: 0

Rd. 75: 1831 AU 58 CAC 50c--> Yes: 6 (4 Green and 2 Gold) vs No: 0

Rd. 76: 1925 MS 64 Gold CAC $1--> Yes: 9 (3 Green and 6 Gold) vs No: 0

Green CAC on coin and deserves it: 29
Green CAC on coin and doesn't deserve it: 19
Gold CAC on coin and deserves it: 2
Gold CAC on coin but should only be Green: 8
Gold CAC on coin but should not sticker:
Failed to sticker but deserves a sticker: 11
Failed to sticker and should not sticker: 2
Unknown sticker status and deserves a sticker:3
Unknown sticker status and does not deserve a sticker:2


Note: if we don’t know the status of a coin before the reveal and more people say green CAC for a gold CAC coin, then it will go in the area of “Gold CAC on coin but should only be Green” ....see round 3 as the example case

*
Rd. 10 was 4-4...I interpreted that CircCam would consider it a no (based on a similar example), which swayed the overall vote to a lean towards no.
Rd. 13 was tied between green and gold at 4-4...I interpreted that geekpryde would consider it a gold

 

Floor is open...

 

I guess I need to revive this again.

PCGS AU55



jom

 

Yes to the bean.

 

Green on the dime

 

Green

 

Green

 

Green on 1831 10c

 

Green

 

There is a lot to like about this 1821 JR-8 dime. It has beautifully (re)toned and has great eye appeal. But, there appears to be more wear than is appropriate for an AU-55. Yes, there are some elements of weak strike but there is apparent not-insignificant wear on both obverse and reverse. The JR-8 is the only use of these obverse and reverse dies so they should not have been worn down or lapped.

I'll admit to being torn on whether it got a bean. On the one hand, I think it is market over-graded. OTOH, I think CAC could easily have given it the benefit of the doubt due to its toning and general eye appeal.

So, in the end I'll say it got the bean. Why didn't I just say that to begin with?

 

I'm on the fence like @Publius2 ...I'm not sure what to think of the retoned coins in terms of CAC ....I will say
NO CAC

 

Party pooper!

 

Wish it was mine. Green bean.