Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Tiny Punic bronze, attribution questions
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TIF, post: 1816878, member: 56859"]I could use some help with proper attribution of this coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>Apparently the books most likely to help are <span style="color: #0000ff">Burgos, A. </span><i><span style="color: #0000ff">La moneda hispanica desde sus origenes <a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Hasta" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Hasta" rel="nofollow">hasta</a> el siglo V</span></i><span style="color: #0000ff">. (Madrid, 2008)</span><span style="color: #000000"> and </span><a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Villaronga" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Villaronga" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #0000ff">Villaronga</span></a><span style="color: #0000ff">, Leandre. </span><i><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255)">Corpus Nvmmvm Hispaniae Anti Avgvsti Aetatem</span></i><span style="color: #0000ff">. (Madrid: Jose A. Herrero, S.A.; 1994)</span><span style="color: #000000">, which I do not have and since I only have a couple of coins from that part of the ancient world, are not high on my to-buy list. </span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">(seller's picture)</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">[ATTACH=full]297641[/ATTACH] </span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">The seller has attributed it thusly:</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><b>ZEUGITANIA. Carthage. Æ 12mm (1.91 gm).</b> Carthago Nova, ca. 221-218 BC. Wreathed head of Tanit left / Crested Thracian helmet left. CNH 69, 46. Extremely rare. Earthen green patina. Very Fine.</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><br /></span></p><p>Elsewhere (coinproject) the attribution of a nearly identical issue is written as:</p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">City : Barcids in Spain</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Metal : Bronze</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Denomination : Ae 13</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Struck / Cast : struck</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Date Struck : 220 - 215 BC</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Diameter : 12.4 mm</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Weight : 1.404 g</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Die Axis : 6 h</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Obverse Description : Head of Tanit left</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Reverse Description : Helmet</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Primary Reference : CNH pg. 69, 46</span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Reference2 : Burgos 524</span></p><p><br /></p><p>...and the seller of that coinproject coin (from Forvm) as:</p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Carthaginians in Spain, 220-215 BC, Bronze AE 13, Burgos p. 22 # 125, VF, dark green patina, Carthago Nova mint, weight 1.404g, maximum diameter 12.4mm, die axis 180o, 220 - 215 B.C.; obverse head of Tanit left; reverse helmet</span></p><p><br /></p><p>I do not see it listed as being a Zeugitana issue on <a href="http://www.magnagraecia.nl/coins/Punic_map/Zeugitana_map/Zeugitana.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.magnagraecia.nl/coins/Punic_map/Zeugitana_map/Zeugitana.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.magnagraecia.nl/coins/Punic_map/Zeugitana_map/Zeugitana.html</a> so am inclined to think it is from Carthago Nova, not Zeugitana.</p><p><br /></p><p>Heritage (from whom I bought it) puts it under the heading of Zeugitana, Carthage, with the same primary reference as the second coin mentioned above.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am therefore confused. Can any of you help clarify this?</p><p><br /></p><p>And if it is from Spain rather than Zeugitana, what is the correct way to write this, if there even<i> is</i> a correct way? I've seen several variations:</p><p><br /></p><p>Iberia, Punic Iberia.</p><p>Spain, Punic Spain.</p><p>Carthaginians in Spain.</p><p>Barcids in Spain.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TIF, post: 1816878, member: 56859"]I could use some help with proper attribution of this coin. Apparently the books most likely to help are [COLOR=#0000ff]Burgos, A. [/COLOR][I][COLOR=#0000ff]La moneda hispanica desde sus origenes [URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Hasta']hasta[/URL] el siglo V[/COLOR][/I][COLOR=#0000ff]. (Madrid, 2008)[/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] and [/COLOR][URL='http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Villaronga'][COLOR=#0000ff]Villaronga[/COLOR][/URL][COLOR=#0000ff], Leandre. [/COLOR][I][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 255)]Corpus Nvmmvm Hispaniae Anti Avgvsti Aetatem[/COLOR][/I][COLOR=#0000ff]. (Madrid: Jose A. Herrero, S.A.; 1994)[/COLOR][COLOR=#000000], which I do not have and since I only have a couple of coins from that part of the ancient world, are not high on my to-buy list. (seller's picture) [ATTACH=full]297641[/ATTACH] The seller has attributed it thusly: [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][B]ZEUGITANIA. Carthage. Æ 12mm (1.91 gm).[/B] Carthago Nova, ca. 221-218 BC. Wreathed head of Tanit left / Crested Thracian helmet left. CNH 69, 46. Extremely rare. Earthen green patina. Very Fine. [/COLOR] Elsewhere (coinproject) the attribution of a nearly identical issue is written as: [COLOR=#0000ff]City : Barcids in Spain Metal : Bronze Denomination : Ae 13 Struck / Cast : struck Date Struck : 220 - 215 BC Diameter : 12.4 mm Weight : 1.404 g Die Axis : 6 h Obverse Description : Head of Tanit left Reverse Description : Helmet Primary Reference : CNH pg. 69, 46 Reference2 : Burgos 524[/COLOR] ...and the seller of that coinproject coin (from Forvm) as: [COLOR=#0000ff]Carthaginians in Spain, 220-215 BC, Bronze AE 13, Burgos p. 22 # 125, VF, dark green patina, Carthago Nova mint, weight 1.404g, maximum diameter 12.4mm, die axis 180o, 220 - 215 B.C.; obverse head of Tanit left; reverse helmet[/COLOR] I do not see it listed as being a Zeugitana issue on [url]http://www.magnagraecia.nl/coins/Punic_map/Zeugitana_map/Zeugitana.html[/url] so am inclined to think it is from Carthago Nova, not Zeugitana. Heritage (from whom I bought it) puts it under the heading of Zeugitana, Carthage, with the same primary reference as the second coin mentioned above. I am therefore confused. Can any of you help clarify this? And if it is from Spain rather than Zeugitana, what is the correct way to write this, if there even[I] is[/I] a correct way? I've seen several variations: Iberia, Punic Iberia. Spain, Punic Spain. Carthaginians in Spain. Barcids in Spain.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Tiny Punic bronze, attribution questions
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...