Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 2129276, member: 19463&quot;]The new numbers for #3 make the matter a great deal more reasonable and telling a 12mm from a 15mm would be no problem in circulation.&nbsp; That leaves the question of the names applied to the denomination.&nbsp; If 2.0g gives you the unit chalkous, 2.9g would be a tri-hemi-chalkon not a trichalkon.&nbsp; I have no idea what standards were being used here but I often wonder at where collectors get some of the names they apply to coins.</p><p>I do not have one smaller than 3.2g and it is a different series (Kyrenaica) but I do have a trident countermark coin that may have been circulating with these.&nbsp; I have been calling it a Ptolemy II but really do not know enough to speak.&nbsp; </p><p>AE28 16.4g</p><p>[ATTACH=full]405244[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in