Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Tiny Indian gold fanam, the "World's Smallest Coin", Rajas of Cochin circa 1600-1800
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TuckHard, post: 3779816, member: 102653"]Hello! Here is a piece I wanted to share with everyone. I'd also appreciate any opinions, feedback, or other examples of these small gold coins! It appears to have a lot of varying details and information online and I just wanted to try to compile everything here and see what looked right.</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]1009702[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p> <p style="text-align: center">0.39 g | 8 mm</p> <p style="text-align: center">AV Vira Raya Fanam</p> <p style="text-align: center">Issued under the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zamorin_of_Calicut" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zamorin_of_Calicut" rel="nofollow">Zamorins of Kalicut</a> and the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Cochin" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Cochin" rel="nofollow">Rajas of Cochin</a></p> <p style="text-align: center">Cochin Mint Type</p> <p style="text-align: center">N.D. circa 1600-1800</p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p><p>I posted this coin in a FB group looking for ID and authentication help. Several people weighed in and thought it looked good and one person shared the below portion of Mitchiner's Oriental Coins and Their Values: Non-Islamic States & Western Colonies.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1009700[/ATTACH]</p><p>From Mitchiner's portion it appears to be a 1586 type; the gold fanam struck by the indigenous kingdoms of Kalicut and Cochin. Mitchiner claims these indigenous coins, called the Vira Raya type, were used as the prototype example for the Dutch India mint in Cochin and shows several of these types. The Dutch coins appear to be of silver and copper and it is not clear from this whether there were gold fanams struck at the Dutch mint in Cochin.</p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]1009701[/ATTACH]</p><p>Looking further online, there are dozens of examples of these coins going to auction. Above is one example with quite a lot of information. The listing calls this a gold fanam from the Dutch India mint of Cochin. The auction also gives an interesting date of circa 1688-18th century.</p><p><br /></p><p>So now, I'm confused at the difference between the Dutch India gold fanams and the Cochin & Kalicut gold fanams. The auction example looks closely similar to Mitchiner's indigenous example as well as fairly close to mine. One possible explanation is that gold fanams that are attributed to the Dutch Indian mint in Cochin were actually issued under the indigenous Cochin and Kalicut Kingdoms.</p><p><br /></p><p>Both Cochin and Kalicut were heavily tied up in Dutch colonialism and Cochin was even occupied by the Dutch during the time frame given by Mitchiner (1600-1800). It's possible the kingdom cities were still able to produce their own coinage during these times. Mitchiner says that the Dutch imitated the coins in their own mint of Cochin and then lists silver and copper imitations. It makes sense to me that the gold fanams were either solely produced by the indigenous kingdom or, if they were made by the Dutch, they appear to be identical.</p><p><br /></p><p>Digging to the more community side of sources, I went to Numista where I found around a dozen similar looking pieces from all different mints such <a href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces22189.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces22189.html" rel="nofollow">Cochin</a>, <a href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces60360.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces60360.html" rel="nofollow">Kalicut</a>, <a href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces102365.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces102365.html" rel="nofollow">Tuticorin</a>, <a href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces19019.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces19019.html" rel="nofollow">Vijayanagara</a>, and most interestingly, the <a href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces74837.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces74837.html" rel="nofollow">Kingdom of Hoysala</a> (1026–1343 AD).</p><p><br /></p><p>Both the Cochin and Kalicut Numista pages point to KM#10 which points to the British Protectorate portion of Cochin. Krause lists the date as 1795-1850, which again doesn't really clarify anything. See the <a href="https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/india-princely-states-cochin-fanam-km-10-1795-1850-cuid-1145061-duid-1485821" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/india-princely-states-cochin-fanam-km-10-1795-1850-cuid-1145061-duid-1485821" rel="nofollow">Krause listing here</a>, on NGC's Price Guide site.</p><p><br /></p><p>Just in August, member <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/members/muhammad-niazi.83232/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/members/muhammad-niazi.83232/">Muhammad Niazi</a> posted a thread titled "<a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/cochin-fanam-or-coorg.345014/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/cochin-fanam-or-coorg.345014/">cochin fanam or coorg</a>" where he posted the below photo. His example appears to be the closest to mine that I could find. It has the distinctive straight "J" symbol on the reverse and the right hanging arm on the obverse. Notice some differences such as the second branch off the J on my example and how the dots in the obverse right arm are symmetrical in his example but tighter in mine. He attributes it as Cochin issue.</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]1009710[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]1009702[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p><p>The last thing I want to share is <a href="http://coins.lakdiva.org/medievalindian/hoysalas_fanam_au.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://coins.lakdiva.org/medievalindian/hoysalas_fanam_au.html" rel="nofollow">this page</a> from LakdivaCoins Collection. I stumbled upon from the Numista page for Kingdom of Hoysala issues from 1026–1343 AD. The page gives a good history and summary of the gold fanams and their relevance to Sri Lankan coinage and gold fanams issued there. LakdivaCoins Collection brings several useful bits of information.</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center"><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This portion discusses the varying designs and explains how some of the fanams have the J tail and some (like Muhammad Niazi's and mine) are straight "like a crocodile".</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center"><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Finally, the long-lusted answer to the age old question of "how did they not lose them"/"how is that even practical".</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center"><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This part is possibly the most important. It explains how so many of these coins are available at such reasonable prices. Last year I was sent a fake gold fanam from an Indian eBay seller. Sorry for the poor photos below. Luckily it was a completely separate coin than the one listed in the photos and description so eBay was quick to give me the money back. I am also somewhat relieved by the thought that the fake fanam I received was an obvious fake and very distinguishable from both my example and other pieces I see online. Album's quote above still makes me wonder about the authenticity of the other pieces, however.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1009722[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>At the end of this research, I'm still unsure of the role of the Dutch mint in the Cochin AV fanams and I'd love some opinions and further information. Thanks for reading this![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TuckHard, post: 3779816, member: 102653"]Hello! Here is a piece I wanted to share with everyone. I'd also appreciate any opinions, feedback, or other examples of these small gold coins! It appears to have a lot of varying details and information online and I just wanted to try to compile everything here and see what looked right. [CENTER][ATTACH=full]1009702[/ATTACH] 0.39 g | 8 mm AV Vira Raya Fanam Issued under the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zamorin_of_Calicut']Zamorins of Kalicut[/URL] and the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Cochin']Rajas of Cochin[/URL] Cochin Mint Type N.D. circa 1600-1800 [/CENTER] I posted this coin in a FB group looking for ID and authentication help. Several people weighed in and thought it looked good and one person shared the below portion of Mitchiner's Oriental Coins and Their Values: Non-Islamic States & Western Colonies. [ATTACH=full]1009700[/ATTACH] From Mitchiner's portion it appears to be a 1586 type; the gold fanam struck by the indigenous kingdoms of Kalicut and Cochin. Mitchiner claims these indigenous coins, called the Vira Raya type, were used as the prototype example for the Dutch India mint in Cochin and shows several of these types. The Dutch coins appear to be of silver and copper and it is not clear from this whether there were gold fanams struck at the Dutch mint in Cochin. [CENTER][ATTACH=full]1009701[/ATTACH][/CENTER] Looking further online, there are dozens of examples of these coins going to auction. Above is one example with quite a lot of information. The listing calls this a gold fanam from the Dutch India mint of Cochin. The auction also gives an interesting date of circa 1688-18th century. So now, I'm confused at the difference between the Dutch India gold fanams and the Cochin & Kalicut gold fanams. The auction example looks closely similar to Mitchiner's indigenous example as well as fairly close to mine. One possible explanation is that gold fanams that are attributed to the Dutch Indian mint in Cochin were actually issued under the indigenous Cochin and Kalicut Kingdoms. Both Cochin and Kalicut were heavily tied up in Dutch colonialism and Cochin was even occupied by the Dutch during the time frame given by Mitchiner (1600-1800). It's possible the kingdom cities were still able to produce their own coinage during these times. Mitchiner says that the Dutch imitated the coins in their own mint of Cochin and then lists silver and copper imitations. It makes sense to me that the gold fanams were either solely produced by the indigenous kingdom or, if they were made by the Dutch, they appear to be identical. Digging to the more community side of sources, I went to Numista where I found around a dozen similar looking pieces from all different mints such [URL='https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces22189.html']Cochin[/URL], [URL='https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces60360.html']Kalicut[/URL], [URL='https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces102365.html']Tuticorin[/URL], [URL='https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces19019.html']Vijayanagara[/URL], and most interestingly, the [URL='https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces74837.html']Kingdom of Hoysala[/URL] (1026–1343 AD). Both the Cochin and Kalicut Numista pages point to KM#10 which points to the British Protectorate portion of Cochin. Krause lists the date as 1795-1850, which again doesn't really clarify anything. See the [URL='https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/india-princely-states-cochin-fanam-km-10-1795-1850-cuid-1145061-duid-1485821']Krause listing here[/URL], on NGC's Price Guide site. Just in August, member [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/members/muhammad-niazi.83232/']Muhammad Niazi[/URL] posted a thread titled "[URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/cochin-fanam-or-coorg.345014/']cochin fanam or coorg[/URL]" where he posted the below photo. His example appears to be the closest to mine that I could find. It has the distinctive straight "J" symbol on the reverse and the right hanging arm on the obverse. Notice some differences such as the second branch off the J on my example and how the dots in the obverse right arm are symmetrical in his example but tighter in mine. He attributes it as Cochin issue. [CENTER][ATTACH=full]1009710[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1009702[/ATTACH] [/CENTER] The last thing I want to share is [URL='http://coins.lakdiva.org/medievalindian/hoysalas_fanam_au.html']this page[/URL] from LakdivaCoins Collection. I stumbled upon from the Numista page for Kingdom of Hoysala issues from 1026–1343 AD. The page gives a good history and summary of the gold fanams and their relevance to Sri Lankan coinage and gold fanams issued there. LakdivaCoins Collection brings several useful bits of information. [CENTER][/CENTER] This portion discusses the varying designs and explains how some of the fanams have the J tail and some (like Muhammad Niazi's and mine) are straight "like a crocodile". [CENTER][/CENTER] Finally, the long-lusted answer to the age old question of "how did they not lose them"/"how is that even practical". [CENTER][/CENTER] This part is possibly the most important. It explains how so many of these coins are available at such reasonable prices. Last year I was sent a fake gold fanam from an Indian eBay seller. Sorry for the poor photos below. Luckily it was a completely separate coin than the one listed in the photos and description so eBay was quick to give me the money back. I am also somewhat relieved by the thought that the fake fanam I received was an obvious fake and very distinguishable from both my example and other pieces I see online. Album's quote above still makes me wonder about the authenticity of the other pieces, however. [ATTACH=full]1009722[/ATTACH] At the end of this research, I'm still unsure of the role of the Dutch mint in the Cochin AV fanams and I'd love some opinions and further information. Thanks for reading this![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Tiny Indian gold fanam, the "World's Smallest Coin", Rajas of Cochin circa 1600-1800
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...
