Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Tiny Ancient ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1852866, member: 19463"]While I agree with VK's ID, this monogram is one I have not been able to decipher to my satisfaction. Usually after someone points out the answer you can find the letters that make up the name in the monogram but I can't find Justin here. I have no idea what meaning to assign to the phi and ligate ou at the top. I see N and T in the monogram but other letters as well. Sear quotes several earlier references (including BMC) as having assigned the coin to Justinian but I don't see where they got that one either. I have not seen the explanation of how the move ti a Justin II ID was made. I saw one listing claiming the monogram was made up of IUSTINAI KAI SO ISAF but I have to admit my imagination falls way short of seeing that. It at least explains the K. Coins with oficina numbers A through delta (as the OP) are assigned to Constantinople while other mints used something else there like a city initial or a cross for Antioch as shown below. My example here also replaces monogram 8 of the OP coin with monogram 9 which reverses the positions of the phi and the OV ligature. Significance??? There is a lot to study in Byzantine but the OP coin is pretty safely, at least for now, as given by VK.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]309828[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1852866, member: 19463"]While I agree with VK's ID, this monogram is one I have not been able to decipher to my satisfaction. Usually after someone points out the answer you can find the letters that make up the name in the monogram but I can't find Justin here. I have no idea what meaning to assign to the phi and ligate ou at the top. I see N and T in the monogram but other letters as well. Sear quotes several earlier references (including BMC) as having assigned the coin to Justinian but I don't see where they got that one either. I have not seen the explanation of how the move ti a Justin II ID was made. I saw one listing claiming the monogram was made up of IUSTINAI KAI SO ISAF but I have to admit my imagination falls way short of seeing that. It at least explains the K. Coins with oficina numbers A through delta (as the OP) are assigned to Constantinople while other mints used something else there like a city initial or a cross for Antioch as shown below. My example here also replaces monogram 8 of the OP coin with monogram 9 which reverses the positions of the phi and the OV ligature. Significance??? There is a lot to study in Byzantine but the OP coin is pretty safely, at least for now, as given by VK. [ATTACH=full]309828[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Tiny Ancient ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...