Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Dansco_Dude, post: 24824146, member: 147679&quot;]I&#039;m aligning it to match PCGS&#039; standards since PCGS has the strongest reputation in the hobby. Not to say that NGC is bad or a distant second, but I&#039;d rather Numi align with PCGS. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m tailoring Numi so that it gives grading results that align with PCGS for non-ancient coins. And with NGC for ancient coins. It&#039;s not so much defining grading standards towards one TPG&#039;s standards, but rather having so that Numi gives results consistent with a certain TPG [i.e. PCGS].</p><p><br /></p><p>i.e. When it analyzes an MS65 coin in a PCGS holder, it always gives back an MS65.</p><p><br /></p><p>Numi will not give a recommendation to the user on which TPG to use for submission. Thought I might include context to the user that estimated grades best align with PCGS.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>If/when that happens, I may end up updating Numi to align with the new standards to match PCGS&#039; new results. Or I may not update and make a disclaimer that results align more closely with PCGS before their update. It&#039;ll depend on what collectors ask for.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I am always polite to our new robot overlords <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie14" alt=":angelic:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in