Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Three new coins in a day...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2041690, member: 19463"]Today the mail brought three coins and rarely do I get three coins about which I know less. One is a modern Spanish (Philip II????) so it got its own post over on the World pages. One is Byzantine from Cherson but I find conflicting information (guesses seems more accurate) on who issued it. Sear Byzantine (#1775) says Romanus II. I do not have Dumbarton Oaks but the teaser page available online happens to mention the type here as one he leaves with Romanus II while others have moved it to Romanus I. I don't know and, worse, don't know where to look next. This coin has a monogram with PWMA in a cross formation but the loop on the P goes left rather than right. The reverse is a cross on two steps. The seller attributed it to Romanus I but lost my confidence when he went on to quote a Sear number and monogram ID for the reverse that was not a match for this coin. The reverse here is not as clear as the obverse but neither side matches the seller ID information. This is just another coin where what we know for sure and what we think may be the case require some study and seems to be waiting better scholarship than I am prepared to offer.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]372808[/ATTACH]</p><p>The third coin is an AE18 Provincial of Antoninus Pius from Zeugma. I liked the portrait which is higher relief than many I see of the period. The reverse is a temple with fenced in grove in the front. I liked the type which I previously had for Philip I. Next, I like the fact that the reverse shows damage from a die clash with ANTW incuse and backwards at the upper left (and in the inset). Finally, it came with a ticket reading: "ex Haigh/Milne collection Lockdales 08 & Glendining 1934". I wonder if either of those sales included the information about the clash. I wonder if anyone then or now cares about clashes like I do. The coin does not look like a great specimen until you look at some on acsearch which make it look a lot better by comparison. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]372807[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2041690, member: 19463"]Today the mail brought three coins and rarely do I get three coins about which I know less. One is a modern Spanish (Philip II????) so it got its own post over on the World pages. One is Byzantine from Cherson but I find conflicting information (guesses seems more accurate) on who issued it. Sear Byzantine (#1775) says Romanus II. I do not have Dumbarton Oaks but the teaser page available online happens to mention the type here as one he leaves with Romanus II while others have moved it to Romanus I. I don't know and, worse, don't know where to look next. This coin has a monogram with PWMA in a cross formation but the loop on the P goes left rather than right. The reverse is a cross on two steps. The seller attributed it to Romanus I but lost my confidence when he went on to quote a Sear number and monogram ID for the reverse that was not a match for this coin. The reverse here is not as clear as the obverse but neither side matches the seller ID information. This is just another coin where what we know for sure and what we think may be the case require some study and seems to be waiting better scholarship than I am prepared to offer. [ATTACH=full]372808[/ATTACH] The third coin is an AE18 Provincial of Antoninus Pius from Zeugma. I liked the portrait which is higher relief than many I see of the period. The reverse is a temple with fenced in grove in the front. I liked the type which I previously had for Philip I. Next, I like the fact that the reverse shows damage from a die clash with ANTW incuse and backwards at the upper left (and in the inset). Finally, it came with a ticket reading: "ex Haigh/Milne collection Lockdales 08 & Glendining 1934". I wonder if either of those sales included the information about the clash. I wonder if anyone then or now cares about clashes like I do. The coin does not look like a great specimen until you look at some on acsearch which make it look a lot better by comparison. [ATTACH=full]372807[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Three new coins in a day...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...