Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;singig, post: 4862950, member: 93672&quot;]I tried to find an explanation why Göbl replaced Lyons mint(attributed by RIC) with Cologne mint , difficult to find something clear , but for sure its work is more recent and specialised and should be trusted.</p><p><br /></p><p>A possible explanation can be found in this study &#039;&#039;The Coinage of the Gallic Empire&#039;&#039; 2014 , I only searched for some key words , it has 841 pages :</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:58eb4e43-a6d5-4e93-adeb-f374b9749a7f/download_file?safe_filename=Volume_1.pdf&amp;file_format=application%2Fpdf&amp;type_of_work=Thesis" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:58eb4e43-a6d5-4e93-adeb-f374b9749a7f/download_file?safe_filename=Volume_1.pdf&amp;file_format=application%2Fpdf&amp;type_of_work=Thesis" rel="nofollow">https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:58eb4e43-a6d5-4e93-adeb-f374b9749a7f/download_file?safe_filename=Volume_1.pdf&amp;file_format=application/pdf&amp;type_of_work=Thesis</a></p><p><br /></p><p><i>&#039;&#039;...........An important part of the mint attributions for the third century are, still today, based on the works of the great Austrian scholar Vœtter. He attributed Gallienus’s Gallic coinage to the mint of Lyon. The stylistic link with the first coins in Postumus’s name being previously recognized, the later works of the early 20th century were understandably influenced by Vœtter&#039;s attribution: Lyon was usually considered to be Postumus’s main mint, while other mints were often attributed speculatively to different cities...........&#039;&#039;</i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in