Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Thread ATS about "rampant gradeflation"
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 2095738, member: 15309"]If people want to complain about the way PCGS grades coins, that is fine. If they think that market grading is horrible and wish that the old antiquated ANA standards were still used, that is their prerogative. But what you can't do is claim that PCGS does not follow their own standards. They have published a book called THE PCGS OFFICIAL GUIDE TO COIN GRADING AND COUNTERFEIT DETECTION that clearly defines their standards. The relevant section of the book that applies to our current conversation can be found in Chapter 5: ELEMENT OF A COIN'S GRADE, in the first section which addresses the issue of wear. The relevant quotes are shown below.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>For everyone who claims that PCGS states that the dividing point between circulated and uncirculated is the presence of wear, you are wrong. Despite the fact that there may be slight inconsistencies within the text as it relates to the specific rules by grade & series, this portion of the text comes first an firmly establishes the exception to the rule that "wear is wear." PCGS also addresses the specific topic of roll/bag friction on the next page and here is the relevant quote.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This defines the market grading procedure that PCGS uses to determine whether or not a Saint is uncirculated since virtually all of them show some measure of high point friction. It is clear that any wear in the fields will relegate the coin to AU status. If there is no wear in the fields, then PCGS looks for the wear to display a brown grayish look that does not "roll" under a light source. Absent this, they will grade the Saint as a mint state coin. Furthermore, PCGS decided that this point was so important that they included a photo diagram that encompasses almost an entire page (see below).</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Roll%20Friction/Roll%20Friction%20Saint%20Gaudens%20_zpszg7oclli.jpeg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>The PCGS standards are clear. What I have never seen are the written standards relating to roll/bag friction published by the ANA since I don't have a published copy of the ANA standards. Perhaps one of you nice gentleman who revere the ANA grading standards can show us what the policy is.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 2095738, member: 15309"]If people want to complain about the way PCGS grades coins, that is fine. If they think that market grading is horrible and wish that the old antiquated ANA standards were still used, that is their prerogative. But what you can't do is claim that PCGS does not follow their own standards. They have published a book called THE PCGS OFFICIAL GUIDE TO COIN GRADING AND COUNTERFEIT DETECTION that clearly defines their standards. The relevant section of the book that applies to our current conversation can be found in Chapter 5: ELEMENT OF A COIN'S GRADE, in the first section which addresses the issue of wear. The relevant quotes are shown below. For everyone who claims that PCGS states that the dividing point between circulated and uncirculated is the presence of wear, you are wrong. Despite the fact that there may be slight inconsistencies within the text as it relates to the specific rules by grade & series, this portion of the text comes first an firmly establishes the exception to the rule that "wear is wear." PCGS also addresses the specific topic of roll/bag friction on the next page and here is the relevant quote. This defines the market grading procedure that PCGS uses to determine whether or not a Saint is uncirculated since virtually all of them show some measure of high point friction. It is clear that any wear in the fields will relegate the coin to AU status. If there is no wear in the fields, then PCGS looks for the wear to display a brown grayish look that does not "roll" under a light source. Absent this, they will grade the Saint as a mint state coin. Furthermore, PCGS decided that this point was so important that they included a photo diagram that encompasses almost an entire page (see below). [IMG]http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Roll%20Friction/Roll%20Friction%20Saint%20Gaudens%20_zpszg7oclli.jpeg[/IMG] The PCGS standards are clear. What I have never seen are the written standards relating to roll/bag friction published by the ANA since I don't have a published copy of the ANA standards. Perhaps one of you nice gentleman who revere the ANA grading standards can show us what the policy is.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Thread ATS about "rampant gradeflation"
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...