Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Thread ATS about "rampant gradeflation"
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GoldFinger1969, post: 2095237, member: 73489"]But GD, I don't think the original ANA standards or the TPGs ever clearly deliniated a fine line between the 'wear' of bag marks (a specific unique type that you can presumably only get once you are put in a bag off the mint) and CIRCULATION wear.</p><p><br /></p><p>As someone hear said, we really have 2 grading systems: 1-58 for circulated coins, MS60-70 for uncirculated.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Wait -- if the 'wear' in the mint building happened in the mint bags, you just said it isn't wear even if it's in the mint bag and outside the mint building.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Well, you have a point here -- I see where you are coming from.</p><p><br /></p><p>But I think the overwhelming majoriy of collectors and numsimatists in the 1980's when the TPGs came into prominence were comfortable with a flexible interpretation of how to grade.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Maybe it was right. Maybe it was wrong. I dunno.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>All I can say is, as someone who has re-immersed himself in the hobby the last few years, while I am troubled by The Resubmission Game, and the Franklin Quarter Thread @ CU, and other extreme examples of inconsistencies, I repeat:</p><p><br /></p><p><b><span style="color: #b30000"><u>The far greater threat is counterfeit coins and counterfeit slabs and maybe the proliferation of new mint products which are also graded and mimic the proliferation of the 10-fold increase in baseball cards between 1986 and 1994 that effectively killed that hobby.</u></span></b>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GoldFinger1969, post: 2095237, member: 73489"]But GD, I don't think the original ANA standards or the TPGs ever clearly deliniated a fine line between the 'wear' of bag marks (a specific unique type that you can presumably only get once you are put in a bag off the mint) and CIRCULATION wear. As someone hear said, we really have 2 grading systems: 1-58 for circulated coins, MS60-70 for uncirculated. Wait -- if the 'wear' in the mint building happened in the mint bags, you just said it isn't wear even if it's in the mint bag and outside the mint building. Well, you have a point here -- I see where you are coming from. But I think the overwhelming majoriy of collectors and numsimatists in the 1980's when the TPGs came into prominence were comfortable with a flexible interpretation of how to grade. [B]Maybe it was right. Maybe it was wrong. I dunno.[/B] All I can say is, as someone who has re-immersed himself in the hobby the last few years, while I am troubled by The Resubmission Game, and the Franklin Quarter Thread @ CU, and other extreme examples of inconsistencies, I repeat: [B][COLOR=#b30000][U]The far greater threat is counterfeit coins and counterfeit slabs and maybe the proliferation of new mint products which are also graded and mimic the proliferation of the 10-fold increase in baseball cards between 1986 and 1994 that effectively killed that hobby.[/U][/COLOR][/B][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Thread ATS about "rampant gradeflation"
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...