Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 2094574, member: 15309&quot;]Stop beating around the bush.&nbsp; If you have something to say, say it.&nbsp; I deduced that you don&#039;t have a cellphone because your philosophy with regards to coin grading is rigid &amp; antiquated.&nbsp; Given your personality and age, it was logical to assume that you would also resist progress in other areas of life, including technological advances.&nbsp; You call it stereotyping, but that is just a meager attempt to prey upon the political correctness of others who don&#039;t want to be guilty of &quot;stereotyping&quot; as if it was more evil than the most heinous crime.&nbsp; What you should do is try to understand why I was able to deduce that you don&#039;t have a cellphone and what it says about you!</p><p><br /></p><p>The only one who thinks that market grading standards are spurious is you.&nbsp; That is the whole point of this conversation.&nbsp; The grading process has evolved from the black and white rendition that you love so much.&nbsp; Instead of adapting to the new and improved standards, you just cry about them incessantly.&nbsp; And it is tiresome, so very tiresome.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the Saints, I don&#039;t understand your question.&nbsp; They certainly were not struck with high point friction.&nbsp; The friction is the result of coin to coin contact within the bags.&nbsp; I have only ever owned one Saint in my life.&nbsp; And believe it or not, it was an MS63 with rainbow toning.&nbsp; This coin had high point friction on both the breast and knee.&nbsp; The TPGs deemed that the coin was mint state because there were no traces of wear in the fields of the coin.&nbsp; That is their standard, and the standard that has been accepted by the rest of the numismatic community, whether you like it or not.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in