Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="eddiespin, post: 2093342, member: 4920"]... This page two you cite to only serves to illustrate the fundamental difference between the way you conceive of wear and the way we conceive of wear. I throw in with Doug, there, as I conceive of wear, in the same, exact way. Click on the link and look at his top post on that page. I just explained that, in another thread, almost word-for-word, to Goldfinger. In short, we conceive of wear from a condition standpoint, while you conceive of it  from a source standpoint. We want to know how much less the condition of the coin is for the wear, while you want to know whether the cabinet or cash register was the source of the wear. If you adjudge the wear to have sourced from the cabinet, you differentiate same as "friction," "abrasion," or "roll," so as to keep you in your comfort zone. We think that's plumb silly, as wear is wear, and the condition suffers for it, regardless of the source.[/QUOTE]