Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Thread ATS about "rampant gradeflation"
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GoldFinger1969, post: 2087600, member: 73489"]Fair point, but I think <b>if the photos are pretty good that most of the time there isn't much of a difference vs. examining it in person under ideal lighting conditions. </b>As good as in person under proper lighting ? Of course not...but unless it's a super-high end coin where you have to look for tiny details, most of the time high-end photos are satisfactory.</p><p><br /></p><p>Even when they have done tests using actual graders who have the coins in front of them, they find that the pros come to different grades and have trouble ID'ing which coins are MS-65, 66, etc. when asked to choose.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Agreed....while I can understand that the purists might look down to the TPGs, all-in-all, they do a good job and provide a useful service. <b><span style="color: #0000ff">That's why I think they are a big plus overall.</span></b></p><p><br /></p><p>My only quibble is that it means they need to maintain their standards of consistency when grading. NOBODY expects perfection, but they shouldn't be off by more than 1 grade for the most part....2 grades off should be very rare, especially for more common coins (i.e., Saints, Morgans).</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Agreed....what I find troubling is that nobody seems to agree on WHEN (or sometimes IF) the loose standards took place. I thought it happened during/after The Bubble years (1988-91), mostly the mid-1990's and lasted a few years, maybe up to a decade.</p><p><br /></p><p><b><span style="color: #0000ff">Pros I have talked to have said that the presence of the internet in the late-1990's/early-2000's led to the inability to pass off overgraded coins or series that were notorious for being overgraded.</span></b> Seems logical to me, look at how much information you can get from 1 hour reading this forum or just Googling a topic as opposed to trying to get that same information 20+ years ago (phone calls, Gray Sheet, going to a LCS or coin show, etc. -- tedious and slow and time-consuming).</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b><span style="color: #00b300">Bravo <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie33" alt=":cigar:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.....</span></b>unless this person is spending an hour on each coin and cataloging/listing every blemish/nick/scratch/ding he/she sees under a 5x lens, how can you make a 1/2 point grade differential ?</p><p><br /></p><p>MAYBE you can do it between MS-70's, 69's, and 68's where the amount of imperfections is alot lower. But to use it on MS-66's, 65's, and lower is....ridiculous.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GoldFinger1969, post: 2087600, member: 73489"]Fair point, but I think [B]if the photos are pretty good that most of the time there isn't much of a difference vs. examining it in person under ideal lighting conditions. [/B]As good as in person under proper lighting ? Of course not...but unless it's a super-high end coin where you have to look for tiny details, most of the time high-end photos are satisfactory. Even when they have done tests using actual graders who have the coins in front of them, they find that the pros come to different grades and have trouble ID'ing which coins are MS-65, 66, etc. when asked to choose. Agreed....while I can understand that the purists might look down to the TPGs, all-in-all, they do a good job and provide a useful service. [B][COLOR=#0000ff]That's why I think they are a big plus overall.[/COLOR][/B] My only quibble is that it means they need to maintain their standards of consistency when grading. NOBODY expects perfection, but they shouldn't be off by more than 1 grade for the most part....2 grades off should be very rare, especially for more common coins (i.e., Saints, Morgans). Agreed....what I find troubling is that nobody seems to agree on WHEN (or sometimes IF) the loose standards took place. I thought it happened during/after The Bubble years (1988-91), mostly the mid-1990's and lasted a few years, maybe up to a decade. [B][COLOR=#0000ff]Pros I have talked to have said that the presence of the internet in the late-1990's/early-2000's led to the inability to pass off overgraded coins or series that were notorious for being overgraded.[/COLOR][/B] Seems logical to me, look at how much information you can get from 1 hour reading this forum or just Googling a topic as opposed to trying to get that same information 20+ years ago (phone calls, Gray Sheet, going to a LCS or coin show, etc. -- tedious and slow and time-consuming). [B][COLOR=#00b300]Bravo :cigar:.....[/COLOR][/B]unless this person is spending an hour on each coin and cataloging/listing every blemish/nick/scratch/ding he/she sees under a 5x lens, how can you make a 1/2 point grade differential ? MAYBE you can do it between MS-70's, 69's, and 68's where the amount of imperfections is alot lower. But to use it on MS-66's, 65's, and lower is....ridiculous.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Thread ATS about "rampant gradeflation"
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...