Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 2413271, member: 22331&quot;]I trust you&#039;ll note that in my post the opinion was qualified, thus: &quot;I can post several that don&#039;t have the condition of those coins, <b>from the detail I&#039;ve viewed</b>.&quot; I also stated that my relative comparison/opinion wasn&#039;t based on images, but by a comparable PCGS MS65 Morgan being held in hand and compared to the OP images as I typed, thus: &quot;One of the coins is a PCGS MS65 8&quot; DMPL, which has appreciable chatter, mini-scratches/dings in Obverse fields, and probably a dozen mini-scratches/dings in prominent Obverse devices. The Reverse has minimal micro-scratches in the fields.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>Having regularly acquired the subject coins through viewing images since auction sites were commonplace, it is generally very evident when fields and devices are less than appropriate for the grade. The links I provided could relatively be understood by a knowledgeable observer as deficient grade product, which I could explain with understanding.</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in