Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 3533571, member: 15309&quot;]<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">The comment isn&#039;t stupid, ignorant, or nonsense, it is merely hyperbolic.&nbsp; But when I see one of the biggest players in the Saint registry game backing the comment and I see coins like the Duckor MS67 shown below, it gives credence to the passage.</span></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/ksq4n71.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><i><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"><br /></span></i></p><p><i><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"><br /></span></i></p><p><br /></p><p>You type this last statement as if you weren&#039;t complicit in the very behavior your are condemning.&nbsp; Earlier in this thread, you wrote this:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This means that you agree with the market grading practice of assigning mint state grades to coins with high point friction.</p><p><br /></p><p>And for proof, we only need to look at your comments about the Duckor MS67 shown above.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>So you can&#039;t decry the passage in the PCGS book when you and your company are essentially using the exact same market grading standard when grading Saints.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in