Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Thoughts on cabinet friction from a professional grader.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 3525219, member: 24314"]Jaelus, posted: "I don't disagree with you. Wear is a type of damage (to be clear - I'm not using the numismatic meaning of damage here - I'm saying that wear/rub damages the surfaces of the coin). [<i><span style="color: #ff0000"><b>AGREE</b></span>] As</i> wear happens in a rather uniform and understandable way on a given type, this type of damage (non-numismatic - I'm talking about <i>literal damage</i>) has been used to grade the state of preservation of the coin. [<b><i><span style="color: #ff0000">AGREE</span></i></b>]</p><p><br /></p><p>But the problem created by using damage from wear to grade the coin is that it <b>doesn't leave any way to grade coins that don't have damage from wear</b>. [<b><i><span style="color: #ff0000">AGREE. THAT'S BECAUSE WEAR (Damage to the coin's surface) IS NOT A CONSIDERATION WHEN GRADING MINT STATE (60-70) COINS!</span></i></b>] Which is why we use 61-70 instead of just a single grade for 60 representing no wear. Obviously, there are states of quality that also apply to coins without wear.</p><p><br /></p><p>What I'm advocating for is solving <b><span style="color: #660066">this problem</span></b> [<b><span style="color: #ff0000">IMO, there is no problem EXCEPT for those who don't understand that wear is not used to grade MS coins. The amount of wear determines a coin's circulated grade</span></b>!] by saying <i>wear is not special</i>. Instead of using wear to grade the coin, you use <i>any</i> damage, including marks, hairlines, hits, rub, etc. which accounts for wear and also accounts for marks on non-worn coins. This way you have a continuous scale from 1-70 without a break when you encounter coins with no wear.</p><p><br /></p><p>As a side effect of this, it no longer becomes important to distinguish mint state coins from <i>virtually</i> mint state coins." [<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie15" alt=":arghh:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie98" alt=":wacky:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie5" alt=":confused:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie46" alt=":facepalm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <b><i><span style="color: #660066">THIS IS THE PROBLEM!</span></i></b>][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 3525219, member: 24314"]Jaelus, posted: "I don't disagree with you. Wear is a type of damage (to be clear - I'm not using the numismatic meaning of damage here - I'm saying that wear/rub damages the surfaces of the coin). [[I][COLOR=#ff0000][B]AGREE[/B][/COLOR]] As[/I] wear happens in a rather uniform and understandable way on a given type, this type of damage (non-numismatic - I'm talking about [I]literal damage[/I]) has been used to grade the state of preservation of the coin. [[B][I][COLOR=#ff0000]AGREE[/COLOR][/I][/B]] But the problem created by using damage from wear to grade the coin is that it [B]doesn't leave any way to grade coins that don't have damage from wear[/B]. [[B][I][COLOR=#ff0000]AGREE. THAT'S BECAUSE WEAR (Damage to the coin's surface) IS NOT A CONSIDERATION WHEN GRADING MINT STATE (60-70) COINS![/COLOR][/I][/B]] Which is why we use 61-70 instead of just a single grade for 60 representing no wear. Obviously, there are states of quality that also apply to coins without wear. What I'm advocating for is solving [B][COLOR=#660066]this problem[/COLOR][/B] [[B][COLOR=#ff0000]IMO, there is no problem EXCEPT for those who don't understand that wear is not used to grade MS coins. The amount of wear determines a coin's circulated grade[/COLOR][/B]!] by saying [I]wear is not special[/I]. Instead of using wear to grade the coin, you use [I]any[/I] damage, including marks, hairlines, hits, rub, etc. which accounts for wear and also accounts for marks on non-worn coins. This way you have a continuous scale from 1-70 without a break when you encounter coins with no wear. As a side effect of this, it no longer becomes important to distinguish mint state coins from [I]virtually[/I] mint state coins." [:arghh::wacky::confused::facepalm: [B][I][COLOR=#660066]THIS IS THE PROBLEM![/COLOR][/I][/B]][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Thoughts on cabinet friction from a professional grader.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...