Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Thoughts on cabinet friction from a professional grader.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 3520797, member: 24314"]This will not happen as it was tried by the ANA in CO on their certificates at one time.</p><p><br /></p><p>IMO "true" technical grading as used VERY SUCCESSFULLY long ago to describe a coin's condition of preservation was very easy to learn and apply. It was also more precise as virtually ALL of the subjectivity was removed! A coin's eye appeal, strike and especially its <b>VALUE </b>(<span style="color: #b30059">the</span> <span style="color: #b30059">BIGGEST MONKEY WRENCH </span>to any grading system) did not play a part in its grade that was recorded to ID it. Any unusual strike characteristic was mentioned separately - strong or weak - along with anything else such as splotchy toning, corrosion, holes, etc. </p><p><br /></p><p>If this technical system (used for internal records at ANACS while in DC and at the first TPGS - INSAB up until I left) had been adopted by the geniuses who wrote the ANA's Official Grading Guide, then coins would have been graded EXACTLY the same today as in the 1970's and <span style="color: #660033">ONLY their VALUE</span> (as established up or down by the commercial coin market) <span style="color: #660033">would have changed. </span></p><p><br /></p><p>Additionally, the <b><i><span style="color: #b30000">stupid</span></i></b> folly of connecting the number of marks on a coin and the amount of wear on it within each grade as expressed by "typical" or "choice" would not generate the confusion it has to new students. </p><p><br /></p><p>Think about it, marks are easy to quantify, the strike is easy to quantify, luster is easy to quantify, and the amount of wear is easy to quantify. I can teach anyone with good attention to detail and eyesight how to grade coins "technically" in a short period of time. What they will not learn without a great deal of effort is a coin's value as EVERY AU/MS 1884-S $1 will have a different value no matter what its true "technical condition" is![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 3520797, member: 24314"]This will not happen as it was tried by the ANA in CO on their certificates at one time. IMO "true" technical grading as used VERY SUCCESSFULLY long ago to describe a coin's condition of preservation was very easy to learn and apply. It was also more precise as virtually ALL of the subjectivity was removed! A coin's eye appeal, strike and especially its [B]VALUE [/B]([COLOR=#b30059]the[/COLOR] [COLOR=#b30059]BIGGEST MONKEY WRENCH [/COLOR]to any grading system) did not play a part in its grade that was recorded to ID it. Any unusual strike characteristic was mentioned separately - strong or weak - along with anything else such as splotchy toning, corrosion, holes, etc. If this technical system (used for internal records at ANACS while in DC and at the first TPGS - INSAB up until I left) had been adopted by the geniuses who wrote the ANA's Official Grading Guide, then coins would have been graded EXACTLY the same today as in the 1970's and [COLOR=#660033]ONLY their VALUE[/COLOR] (as established up or down by the commercial coin market) [COLOR=#660033]would have changed. [/COLOR] Additionally, the [B][I][COLOR=#b30000]stupid[/COLOR][/I][/B] folly of connecting the number of marks on a coin and the amount of wear on it within each grade as expressed by "typical" or "choice" would not generate the confusion it has to new students. Think about it, marks are easy to quantify, the strike is easy to quantify, luster is easy to quantify, and the amount of wear is easy to quantify. I can teach anyone with good attention to detail and eyesight how to grade coins "technically" in a short period of time. What they will not learn without a great deal of effort is a coin's value as EVERY AU/MS 1884-S $1 will have a different value no matter what its true "technical condition" is![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Thoughts on cabinet friction from a professional grader.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...