Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 8168242, member: 21705&quot;]This makes sense if the records indicate the sharp N reverse was made after or contemporaneous with the elimination of the VDB. By 1909, records about the timing of changes to the design are much better.</p><p><br /></p><p>As usual, when I venture out of my safe space, something as simple as which N is being discussed Obv (U)N(UM, Rev (U)N(ITED), (O)N(E) or (CE)N(T) exposes my ignorance.</p><p><br /></p><p>Photo and Transfer dies appear to be ruled out as the source &quot;coin&quot; since the question is about the inconsistency of an individual reverse die. ie could there be a sharp N VDB die produced at the mint, even if unknown. It&#039;s a slightly different focus than a Mule pairing of known dies.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in