Oh you delicate little flower did you not receive trophy for getting up this morning? I have the right to an opinion as you do, just because you don't agree with that opinion makes me pompous so be it.
Just a thought, Jim, but perhaps neither of us "reported it" because, and as you said, we are not "kids in a cafeteria"? With all due respect; not everyone feels the need to run to the lunch monitor over every little booboo or offense, real or imagined. Perhaps your job would be simpler if more felt the same way.
It's the craziest thing and is very deep, so you may want to take a moment to prepare yourself.... it's because he often signs his name as "Jim"! Now, since I answered your question, even if in a somewhat roundabout way, perhaps you could be so kind as to return the favor? From earlier... Again, in your own words, with no editing, and exactly as written.. "Two... independent events", huh? If this was the case, why even mention the Treasury Department if it adds and has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of what you said?
@BooksB4Coins I read the DCarr quote as such... A statement from the treasury department would be an example of the "more information" mentioned in the previous statement. It wouldn't be the only acceptable form of "more information".