Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
This should set off a bit of a scramble....
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="KBBPLL, post: 25584538, member: 104064"]That's the theory. From the same PCGS blurb:</p><p><br /></p><p>"The extreme rarity of the 1975 "No-S" Proof Dime can be explained in two ways (both plausible conjectures):</p><p><br /></p><p>1. The error was discovered at the Mint in time to stop the press, but not before a very small quantity of sets had already gone out the door.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. The coins were deliberately made. This explanation is not as far-fetched as it may seem, because other remarkable Proof errors emerged from the San Francisco Mint during the early 1970's (for example, a Proof 1970-S Washington Quarter struck over a 1900 Barber Quarter -- from Philadelphia)!"</p><p><br /></p><p>Seems like in 1975 they caught it sooner than the other years, so there are fewer examples. Why it happened multiple times over the course of many years, who knows. I don't buy theory #2 - mint sport - because it would have to be coordinated between someone in Philadelphia who deliberately didn't punch the mint mark and then someone in SF who coined them. I suppose someone in Philly might have deliberately done it for giggles and SF didn't notice it, but it seems more likely that it was just sloppy QC at both mints.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="KBBPLL, post: 25584538, member: 104064"]That's the theory. From the same PCGS blurb: "The extreme rarity of the 1975 "No-S" Proof Dime can be explained in two ways (both plausible conjectures): 1. The error was discovered at the Mint in time to stop the press, but not before a very small quantity of sets had already gone out the door. 2. The coins were deliberately made. This explanation is not as far-fetched as it may seem, because other remarkable Proof errors emerged from the San Francisco Mint during the early 1970's (for example, a Proof 1970-S Washington Quarter struck over a 1900 Barber Quarter -- from Philadelphia)!" Seems like in 1975 they caught it sooner than the other years, so there are fewer examples. Why it happened multiple times over the course of many years, who knows. I don't buy theory #2 - mint sport - because it would have to be coordinated between someone in Philadelphia who deliberately didn't punch the mint mark and then someone in SF who coined them. I suppose someone in Philly might have deliberately done it for giggles and SF didn't notice it, but it seems more likely that it was just sloppy QC at both mints.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
This should set off a bit of a scramble....
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...