Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
This is not a baby! A denarius of Julia Mamaea
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Aestimare, post: 7706583, member: 98537"]I’ve asked for unsubscribing from CT, but till now I can still connect. So, I take time to answer, but I could be interrupted involuntarily.</p><p><br /></p><p>I’m grateful to you [USER=96898]@Orielensis[/USER] for your diplomatic intervention.</p><p>I do agree with you that a die study will infirm or confirm our hypotheses, regrouping the “Palladium” types chronologically, or spreading them out over time.</p><p>But I think in this case, it would be unnecessary, but complementary.</p><p><br /></p><p>I can distinguish 3 dies on the picture of what I suppose to be Palladium types. Those are just bronze sestertii. Some denarii exist with the same representation. Too many identical errors then : no doubt this is not a die-engraver error as you interpreted it, Roman Collector, nor a confusion, as you proposed, Orielensis. I’m convinced it is intentional.</p><p><br /></p><p>I leave you judge of the similarity of some Palladium types from Julia Mamaea denarii : not all the coins are of good style, many are schematized (the ones I have chosen). That’s why we don’t see splendid Palladiums on each coin. This is not specific to a reign, but a phenomenon that can be noticed on many Greek and Roman coins. Even someone is not familiar with these, just read on CT how many times, some collectors comment their sample with a satisfying : “good style”.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1322172[/ATTACH]</p><p>RIC 360 2,68g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4801231" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4801231" rel="nofollow">Savoca Numismatik 5th Blue Auction 24.02.2018 Lot 1252</a></p><p>RIC 360 2,75g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6780322" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6780322" rel="nofollow">Savoca Numismatik 41st Silver Auction 23.02.2020 Lot 344</a></p><p>RIC 360 2,81g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=790948" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=790948" rel="nofollow">A. Tkalec AG Auction May 2010 17.05.2010 Lot 352</a></p><p>RIC 360 3,03g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1819043" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1819043" rel="nofollow">Roma Numismatics Limited E-Sale 4 28.12.2013 Lot 758</a></p><p>RIC 360 3,04g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6934540" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6934540" rel="nofollow">Savoca Numismatik 42nd Silver Auction 29.03.2020 Lot 327</a></p><p>RIC 360 3,16g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=840504" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=840504" rel="nofollow">Rauch Summer Auction 2010 13.09.2010 Lot 1031</a></p><p>RIC 360 3,52g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6045150" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6045150" rel="nofollow">ibercoin Online Auction 28 05.06.2019 Lot 211</a></p><p>ses RIC 708 01 = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=500937" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=500937" rel="nofollow">Stack's Coin Galleries September 2008 10.09.2008 Lot 429</a></p><p>ses RIC 708 18,17g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=7411820" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=7411820" rel="nofollow">Roma Numismatics Limited E-Sale 75 15.10.2020 Lot 694</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I had forgotten to mention about the Julia Soaemias' denarius on the previous page : RIC 237 3.37g 19.8mm 1h </p><p><br /></p><p>Thank you all for your welcome.</p><p><br /></p><p>Aestimare.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Aestimare, post: 7706583, member: 98537"]I’ve asked for unsubscribing from CT, but till now I can still connect. So, I take time to answer, but I could be interrupted involuntarily. I’m grateful to you [USER=96898]@Orielensis[/USER] for your diplomatic intervention. I do agree with you that a die study will infirm or confirm our hypotheses, regrouping the “Palladium” types chronologically, or spreading them out over time. But I think in this case, it would be unnecessary, but complementary. I can distinguish 3 dies on the picture of what I suppose to be Palladium types. Those are just bronze sestertii. Some denarii exist with the same representation. Too many identical errors then : no doubt this is not a die-engraver error as you interpreted it, Roman Collector, nor a confusion, as you proposed, Orielensis. I’m convinced it is intentional. I leave you judge of the similarity of some Palladium types from Julia Mamaea denarii : not all the coins are of good style, many are schematized (the ones I have chosen). That’s why we don’t see splendid Palladiums on each coin. This is not specific to a reign, but a phenomenon that can be noticed on many Greek and Roman coins. Even someone is not familiar with these, just read on CT how many times, some collectors comment their sample with a satisfying : “good style”. [ATTACH=full]1322172[/ATTACH] RIC 360 2,68g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4801231']Savoca Numismatik 5th Blue Auction 24.02.2018 Lot 1252[/URL] RIC 360 2,75g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6780322']Savoca Numismatik 41st Silver Auction 23.02.2020 Lot 344[/URL] RIC 360 2,81g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=790948']A. Tkalec AG Auction May 2010 17.05.2010 Lot 352[/URL] RIC 360 3,03g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1819043']Roma Numismatics Limited E-Sale 4 28.12.2013 Lot 758[/URL] RIC 360 3,04g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6934540']Savoca Numismatik 42nd Silver Auction 29.03.2020 Lot 327[/URL] RIC 360 3,16g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=840504']Rauch Summer Auction 2010 13.09.2010 Lot 1031[/URL] RIC 360 3,52g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=6045150']ibercoin Online Auction 28 05.06.2019 Lot 211[/URL] ses RIC 708 01 = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=500937']Stack's Coin Galleries September 2008 10.09.2008 Lot 429[/URL] ses RIC 708 18,17g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=7411820']Roma Numismatics Limited E-Sale 75 15.10.2020 Lot 694[/URL] I had forgotten to mention about the Julia Soaemias' denarius on the previous page : RIC 237 3.37g 19.8mm 1h Thank you all for your welcome. Aestimare.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
This is not a baby! A denarius of Julia Mamaea
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...