Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
This is not a baby! A denarius of Julia Mamaea
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Aestimare, post: 7695691, member: 98537"]<font size="4"><b>@<a href="https://www.cointalk.com/members/roman-collector.75937/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/members/roman-collector.75937/">Roman Collector</a></b></font> , I really appreciate your work, and I’ve been very disappointed with your cold reaction, but I’m grateful too till I prefer a sentence rather indifference. I don’t want to offend anybody, but I agree that by clumsiness I can cause trouble. I apologize sincerely : my remarks were excessive.</p><p><br /></p><p>That’s a fact Juno doesn’t need a syncretism to hold a flower. Your interpretation is full of sens. Yes, Juno Lucina is protecting childbirth, and yes, the flower symbolizes fertility. The presence of children is emblematic of this characteristic under the Antonines, and the same representation for Mamaea lets no doubts about Juno’s function.</p><p><br /></p><p>The identity of an eventual Palladium is clear for me. Here are three sestertii which illustrate for a <a href="http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.1151" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.1151" rel="nofollow">unique emission</a>, the diversity of its representations, stating it can’t be reduced to a single one :</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1321001[/ATTACH]</p><p><a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-13542" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-13542" rel="nofollow">British Museum R.13542</a></p><p><a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-13543" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-13543" rel="nofollow">British Museum R.13543</a></p><p><a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-13544" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-13544" rel="nofollow">British Museum R.13544</a></p><p>I didn’t choose schematic pictures on these samples for Faustina, then the only coin which is comparable for Mamaea is the one of CNGea 412, Lot 634, but if I had considered denarii, I believe the proximity with the others Mamaea’s samples would have been more speaking :</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1321000[/ATTACH]</p><p>16.28g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4550196" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4550196" rel="nofollow">Peus E-Auction 420 18.11.2017 Lot 5511</a></p><p>17.22g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1025558" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1025558" rel="nofollow">Nudelman Numismatica Auction 10 13.06.2011 Lot 238</a></p><p>17.25g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4698771" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4698771" rel="nofollow">CNGea 412, Lot 634. Closing Jan 17, 2018</a></p><p>20.94g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1573869" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1573869" rel="nofollow">Cayón Subastas Subasta extraordinaria 09.05.2013 Lot 148</a></p><p>23.14g = <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1478010" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1478010" rel="nofollow">CNGea 293, Lot 389. Closing Dec 19, 2012</a></p><p>27.70g = <a href="https://www.coryssa.org/2545786/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.coryssa.org/2545786/" rel="nofollow">eBay gadires 264064023159</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I let anyone interpreting the presence of the Palladium in Juno’s hands, and I would be happy to hear CT members’ ones.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Aestimare, post: 7695691, member: 98537"][SIZE=4][B]@[URL='https://www.cointalk.com/members/roman-collector.75937/']Roman Collector[/URL][/B][/SIZE] , I really appreciate your work, and I’ve been very disappointed with your cold reaction, but I’m grateful too till I prefer a sentence rather indifference. I don’t want to offend anybody, but I agree that by clumsiness I can cause trouble. I apologize sincerely : my remarks were excessive. That’s a fact Juno doesn’t need a syncretism to hold a flower. Your interpretation is full of sens. Yes, Juno Lucina is protecting childbirth, and yes, the flower symbolizes fertility. The presence of children is emblematic of this characteristic under the Antonines, and the same representation for Mamaea lets no doubts about Juno’s function. The identity of an eventual Palladium is clear for me. Here are three sestertii which illustrate for a [URL='http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.1151']unique emission[/URL], the diversity of its representations, stating it can’t be reduced to a single one : [ATTACH=full]1321001[/ATTACH] [URL='https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-13542']British Museum R.13542[/URL] [URL='https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-13543']British Museum R.13543[/URL] [URL='https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-13544']British Museum R.13544[/URL] I didn’t choose schematic pictures on these samples for Faustina, then the only coin which is comparable for Mamaea is the one of CNGea 412, Lot 634, but if I had considered denarii, I believe the proximity with the others Mamaea’s samples would have been more speaking : [ATTACH=full]1321000[/ATTACH] 16.28g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4550196']Peus E-Auction 420 18.11.2017 Lot 5511[/URL] 17.22g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1025558']Nudelman Numismatica Auction 10 13.06.2011 Lot 238[/URL] 17.25g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4698771']CNGea 412, Lot 634. Closing Jan 17, 2018[/URL] 20.94g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1573869']Cayón Subastas Subasta extraordinaria 09.05.2013 Lot 148[/URL] 23.14g = [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=1478010']CNGea 293, Lot 389. Closing Dec 19, 2012[/URL] 27.70g = [URL='https://www.coryssa.org/2545786/']eBay gadires 264064023159[/URL] I let anyone interpreting the presence of the Palladium in Juno’s hands, and I would be happy to hear CT members’ ones.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
This is not a baby! A denarius of Julia Mamaea
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...